Anyone using Lispworks or Windows?

[nunb]

The quicklisp demo movie[1] demonstrates an installer that only
requires a CL to run (does not assume unixisms).

Could someone test this on Windows? The persistent problems there have
been threading support on sbcl (ccl, LW etc seem fine) and asdf's
symlink-oriented approach.

[1] http://is.gd/eU9qb

[Joerthan Panest]

I have both Win XP and an LW Pro license (as well as an interest in
Quicklisp). What exactly would you like tested?

Cheers.

[Zach Beane]

Quicklisp works fine on LispWorks for Windows, but weblocks will not
load due to a cl-cont issue.

Zach

On Sep 3, 11:32 pm, nunb <nandan.bagc...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Nandan Bagchee]

I have both Win XP and an LW Pro license (as well as an interest in
Quicklisp). What exactly would you like tested?

Whether Quicklisp works with loading Weblocks for LW on Windows.

 

[Nandan Bagchee]

Quicklisp works fine on LispWorks for Windows, but weblocks will not
load due to a cl-cont issue.

Do you have a stacktrace or other error report?

 

[Nandan Bagchee]

> Do you have a stacktrace or other error report?

 

oops sorry, just saw the previous post. 

[Zach Beane]

With the fix to cl-cont, Quicklisp can load and run Weblocks just fine
in LispWorks for Windows. Drop me an email if you'd like to try it.

Zach