SEED 관련 W3C 코멘트

34 views
Skip to first unread message

Mountie Lee

unread,
Oct 6, 2013, 9:57:16 PM10/6/13
to 김기문, webc...@googlegroups.com
아래와 같이 자료요청이 왔습니다.

* What operations are supported
* What parameters are supported
* Exact references to documentation about the implementation
* Known answer tests

KISA에서 준비가능한 내용이 어디까지인지요?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ryan Sleevi <sle...@google.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: SEED algorithm name at WebCrypto API Spec
To: Richard Barnes <rba...@bbn.com>
Cc: Arun Ranganathan <ar...@mozilla.com>, Mountie Lee <mou...@paygate.net>, Web Cryptography Working Group <public-w...@w3.org>


If we're agreed on that, then I agree.

Mountie,

Would you like to propose a specific set of text to be included, such as:
What operations are supported
What parameters are supported
Exact references to documentation about the implementation
Known answer tests

And I'll be happy to assign an identifier, even if no one will implement :)

On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Richard Barnes <rba...@bbn.com> wrote:
> I agree that SEED isn't a silver bullet, but I don't really see the harm in assigning them an identifier, regardless of browser support.
>
> Identifiers are cheap, and the existence of an identifier for an algorithm doesn't at all imply that browsers need to support it.
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Arun Ranganathan <ar...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
>> Since https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478839 in NSS and Fx 3.5.x, I don't believe we've materially moved the needle on unblocking the actual use cases where SEED is used.
>>
>> I'm increasingly convinced that SEED alone isn't a silver bullet to unblocking the use cases in S. Korea, and so I'm not sure that ACTION-64 is the right one to take up within this WG.
>>
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Mountie Lee wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know actually.
>>>
>>> my question is based on ACTION-64 (http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/track/actions/64)
>>>
>>> regards
>>> mountie.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sle...@google.com> wrote:
>>> Does any user agent actually plan to implement SEED?
>>>
>>> On Sep 30, 2013 11:04 PM, "Mountie Lee" <mou...@paygate.net> wrote:
>>> Hi. Ryan.
>>>
>>> when I see the list of registered algorithms at latest API spec
>>> ( https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html#algorithms )
>>>
>>> I can not find SEED as algorithm name.
>>>
>>> what is required to add SEED as algorithm name in spec?
>>>
>>> regards
>>> mountie.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mountie Lee
>>>
>>> PayGate
>>> CTO, CISSP
>>> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
>>> E-Mail : mou...@paygate.net
>>>
>>> =======================================
>>> PayGate Inc.
>>> THE STANDARD FOR ONLINE PAYMENT
>>> for Korea, Japan, China, and the World
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mountie Lee
>>>
>>> PayGate
>>> CTO, CISSP
>>> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
>>> E-Mail : mou...@paygate.net
>>>
>>> =======================================
>>> PayGate Inc.
>>> THE STANDARD FOR ONLINE PAYMENT
>>> for Korea, Japan, China, and the World
>>>
>>>
>>
>



--
Mountie Lee

PayGate
CTO, CISSP
Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
E-Mail : mou...@paygate.net

=======================================
PayGate Inc.
THE STANDARD FOR ONLINE PAYMENT
for Korea, Japan, China, and the World

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages