New system like web2pyslices ( redesign and remodel maybe ) to web2py

161 views
Skip to first unread message

Marlysson Silva

unread,
Feb 25, 2017, 6:07:51 PM2/25/17
to web2py-users

Hi people.

What you think about redesign the web2pyslices website?

Donald McClymont

unread,
Feb 26, 2017, 5:12:39 PM2/26/17
to web2py-users
I think something should be done - the current site never seems to be up any more - I just get ticket issue unrecoverable when I access.  I also think we could look at a different approach with basically just using github for storing everything and the slices just provides a searchable directory of links for web2py related stuff with some basic details rather than actually storing the code/applications in two places.

Donald

Jim S

unread,
Feb 27, 2017, 2:25:01 PM2/27/17
to web2py-users
+1

Dave S

unread,
Feb 27, 2017, 3:49:12 PM2/27/17
to web2py-users
On Sunday, February 26, 2017 at 2:12:39 PM UTC-8, Donald McClymont wrote:
I think something should be done - the current site never seems to be up any more - I just get ticket issue unrecoverable when I access.  I also think we could look at a different approach with basically just using github for storing everything and the slices just provides a searchable directory of links for web2py related stuff with some basic details rather than actually storing the code/applications in two places.

Donald


While I think the Slices avatar (mascot?) is cute, the search function seems to be inconsistent.  

As for moving forward, I would be okay with several options (somebody needs to choose one, but I'm narrowing it down yet)
   -- something that wasn't too different from the current but with the undercarriage cleaned up
   -- something like a wiki
   -- perhaps some new presentation, but I'd have to see some demos

For any of the three paths, I'd be okay with using pointers to github for the code as long as the pointers could also be to bitbucket or to a snippet site.like Gist or Pastie or JSFiddle.

/dps

Anthony

unread,
Feb 27, 2017, 4:53:25 PM2/27/17
to web2py-users
We might also consider putting some material here: http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/web2py

Marlysson Silva

unread,
Feb 27, 2017, 10:10:35 PM2/27/17
to web2py-users
In brazilian stackoverflow don't disponible , need reputation to access , answer more questions in international stackoverflow .

Leonel Câmara

unread,
Feb 28, 2017, 8:13:57 AM2/28/17
to web2py-users
Created an account just for this last night, need to start working towards that 150 reputation.

Anthony

unread,
Feb 28, 2017, 9:22:00 AM2/28/17
to web2py-users
On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 8:13:57 AM UTC-5, Leonel Câmara wrote:
Created an account just for this last night, need to start working towards that 150 reputation.

I just gave you 10. :-)

Richard Vézina

unread,
Feb 28, 2017, 9:43:46 AM2/28/17
to web2py-users
Another 10!

:)

Richard

--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Ben Lawrence

unread,
Mar 5, 2017, 8:14:54 AM3/5/17
to web2py-users
I prefer we keep everything in the web2py book with extra long code in github. Example code can all go into the book. People go there. It is good.

I tried to contribute to the book https://github.com/web2py/web2py-book/pull/351
but received no feedback. Is this the right way to do it?

Marlysson Silva

unread,
Mar 5, 2017, 10:20:31 AM3/5/17
to web2py-users
Like code example section?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages