web-vitals-feedback

Yes in theory TTFB should be similar for both mobile and desktop. The fact it is not means it's

This trace seems extremely slow compared to PageSpeed Insights: https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/

Please don't spam multiple unrelated issues. Not all URLs are in CrUX and the eligibility

why not showing here report On Saturday 7 September 2024 at 00:41:32 UTC+5:30 Barry Pollard wrote:

Lighthouse issues can be raised here: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/issues I agree this

Gracias por tu respuesta. El vie, 13 sept 2024 a las 12:02, Barry Pollard (<barrypollard@google.

I presume by this you mean why do we use the same thresholds (eg 2.5 seconds for good LCP) for mobile

Hello friends, good time Please give me your opinions about the SEO of ozen.ir I would appreciate it

You biggest issues seems to me a slow TTFB which is slowing all your other loading metrics (FCP, and

Ok. On Tuesday 20 August 2024 at 17:19:00 UTC+5:30 to...@websiteadvantage.com.au wrote: People

They should be the same. Are you passing the formFactor to the CrUX API call to get PHONE or DESKTOP

This is great - thanks Barry. i have kept the debugbear script resident on that subdomain as i can

The Web Vitals currently cannot be measured for soft navigation as used by SPAs. Chrome is currently

Please direct these questions to pagespeed-ins...@googlegroups.com rather than this web-

This question is better directed at pagespeed-ins...@googlegroups.com but usually this

One follow-up question though - Why did we decide to go with img / videos / say, "block-level

Guys, we are facing the same problem. Clicking on text boxes where there shouldn't be any

I think if you configure GA4 manually rather than inside Tag Manager, it all depends on your hard-

Paul, Michal, thank you so much for your responses. Using the react-hydration-on-demand library, I

May you share a link to help us take a look? (And if it takes more than just opening and loading,

I am trying to connect to the CrUX API in Looker Studio to analyze Core Web Vitals data, but I am

Thanks! And sorry.. I wrote IMP ... but I mean INP! Il giorno mercoledì 19 giugno 2024 alle 16:27:13

No CPU or network throttling, but the “Enable advanced paint instrumentation" box was checked. I

Thanks for the feedback! I'll look further into this based on some of the things you mentioned. I

Great responses, thanks all! On Friday, June 14, 2024 at 11:52:34 AM UTC-4 Michal Mocny wrote: The

This conversation is probably better suited to the web vitals feedback group, as it's more a

Dear Michal, Thank you for your feedback. We will definitely explore the intrinsic size property, as

Thanks for the extra clarifications, much appreciated! On Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 3:39:05 PM UTC+3

As I see it, there is a type of website whose organic search results are being hurt by INP. From what

At the moment, we have the following exemptions for LCP elements: Elements with an opacity of 0,