web-vitals-feedback

I am trying to connect to the CrUX API in Looker Studio to analyze Core Web Vitals data, but I am

In general, plain old <a> elements do not tend to cause INP issues, but there are a few reasons

Thanks! And sorry.. I wrote IMP ... but I mean INP! Il giorno mercoledì 19 giugno 2024 alle 16:27:13

No CPU or network throttling, but the “Enable advanced paint instrumentation" box was checked. I

Thanks for the feedback! I'll look further into this based on some of the things you mentioned. I

Great responses, thanks all! On Friday, June 14, 2024 at 11:52:34 AM UTC-4 Michal Mocny wrote: The

This conversation is probably better suited to the web vitals feedback group, as it's more a

Dear Michal, Thank you for your feedback. We will definitely explore the intrinsic size property, as

Thanks for the extra clarifications, much appreciated! On Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 3:39:05 PM UTC+3

As I see it, there is a type of website whose organic search results are being hurt by INP. From what

At the moment, we have the following exemptions for LCP elements: Elements with an opacity of 0,

Please raise an issue here for Lighthouse requests: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/issues

Thank you for providing a demo-- However, I am not able to reproduce (tried MacOS and Android with

An origin needs to be sufficiently popular to appear in CrUX. It seems you experienced a drop in

On Fri, 3 May 2024, 15:19 Jan Nicklas, <gho...@gmail.com> wrote: All CSS state updates would

There are several reasons why the ability to provide visual feedback after an interaction may be

Hi Eric, nice to meet you. I am not sure if the issue you are reporting is similar to the one

Hello, I am also facing the same issue about the INP . I have tried request for validate but still

Hi Barry, Thank you for responding. Just wanted to let you know that we have not yet mapped any webp

This feedback seems reasonable to me. I see you filed this issue which was closed, because this

Hi Michal Any update on this? From our test, INP seems to be more higher on mid-range and low-end

An important point to realise is that INP is currently based on the next paint, not the next

On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 12:57:54 PM UTC+2 Avinash Kumar wrote: Hi Matheus, I have tried the

This is an awesome run down. Thank you! ______________________________________ Tim Manalo (he/him/his

Hi Barry, Thank you for the quick reply. That gives me peace of mind and let's me get back to

Hi - We're using the LoAF API a lot here in Taboola - we have lab-tool we released in an open

LCP are measures from a user's perspective, so can also be affected by changes in your user

Thank you as always, Barry. We've been seeing strong +ve movement across our whole area, and this

Hi Eric, CLS. Yes 0 is a valid CLS score and is taken into account. CLS is reported at the end of the

Well. It has been a full year since I posted this and now we are failing INP. We average 230ms and