1 - Testing (automating a browser-based performance test)
2 - Results storage and retrieval
The presentation is really just a starting point for the conversation
for anyone interested to get on board before we start hashing through
the nitty-gritty details of the interfaces themselves. It would be
great if we could make enough progress on this to make a splash at
Velocity in June and open up web performance testing to all sorts of new
applications and uses.
I have a Google code project set up for the effort where we can document
the interfaces, track issues and store the code for language bindings,
etc: http://code.google.com/p/web-testing-framework/. The presentation
is also available for download in the project repository:
http://web-testing-framework.googlecode.com/files/Standardizing_Web_Performance_Testing.pdf
Thanks,
-Pat
Count me in too.
I had a thought (this might be for a future phase), in addition could we
have similar functionality to a few systems that already exist, that
allow users to download the software (in this case possibly a FireFox
extension) that they can leave running when not at their computer that
will get a list of urls from the main server and run the tests then
beacon back the results. This would possibly ease the load & will add
more diverse results from different locations and
systems/hardware/browsers etc - just a thought, I can explain more if
required.
Eddie.
- A group of people get together and share testing capacity where each
member contributes a location and gets X credits in return to use across
the network
- Someone builds a service where people can get paid for use of their
computers (in free cycles) and the service resells that testing capacity
with a little bit of markup for the service itself
We're looking to offer reference and open source implementations for
some testing capabilities but the real win with standardizing on the
interfaces is that it opens up all sorts of possibilities for the actual
implementations (commercial and free) and hopefully opens up the
development on the application side when you can build an app to the
spec and be able to use it with ANY service implementation.
On 2/20/2011 9:06 AM, Eddie Jaoude wrote:
> Nice one!
>
> Count me in too.
>
> I had a thought (this might be for a future phase), in addition could we
> have similar functionality to a few systems that already exist, that
> allow users to download the software (in this case possibly a FireFox
> extension) that they can leave running when not at their computer that
> will get a list of urls from the main server and run the tests then
> beacon back the results. This would possibly ease the load& will add
--
We provide FREE website monitoring and load testing
http://browsermob.com
Patrick Lightbody
BrowserMob
(w) +1 (503) 828-9003 x 101
(m) +1 (415) 830-5488
> <Standardizing_Web_Performance_Testing.pdf>