ASP.NET vNext

[Ryan Riley]

What should we consider here? Any desire to add support for F#, or should we look at doing something similar based on FAKE and FSharp.Compiler.Service without tying directly into the KRuntime?

[Tony Abell]

I would recommend working on integration with the KRuntime.  This way we benefit from the work done with the tooling and other ecosystem enhancements.  And have FAKE integrate with the KRuntime for more advanced build functionalities. 

[Ryan Riley]

Someone appears to be working on vNext: http://alxandr.me/2014/08/05/vnext-with-a-touch-of-functional/

On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:46:00 AM UTC-7, Ryan Riley wrote:

[Kevin Ransom]

This is a really great post, It has been on my radar for quite a while that we should at the very least, implement this level of F# support for ASP.Vnext.  Supporting the KRuntime is very interesting for the in the cloud compilation scenarios, and so I would consider an "eventually" goal, none of this is a commitment from MS.  They are things I am very interested in making sure work right.
 
Kevin
 

---

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:49:18 -0700
From: ryan....@panesofglass.org
To: web-st...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: ASP.NET vNext

Someone appears to be working on vNext: http://alxandr.me/2014/08/05/vnext-with-a-touch-of-functional/

On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 9:46:00 AM UTC-7, Ryan Riley wrote:

What should we consider here? Any desire to add support for F#, or should we look at doing something similar based on FAKE and FSharp.Compiler.Service without tying directly into the KRuntime?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "F# Web Stack" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web-stack-fs...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.