|
|
|
Key Findings
Most
registered voters:
-
Prefer
to vote for
candidates who
support action on
global warming
-
Think
global warming is
affecting their
cost of living
-
Oppose
policies to
eliminate federal
emergency response
and climate
research and
information
|
|
|
|
|
With
the primaries in the 2026
midterm elections underway, we
find that 58% of registered
voters prefer to vote for a
candidate for public office
who supports action on global
warming, while 14% prefer to
vote for a candidate who
opposes action. We also find
that:
-
42%
would like to hear from
political candidates more
often about efforts to
reduce global warming,
while 23% would like to
hear about this less
often.
-
31%
will only vote for a
congressional candidate
who supports increasing
the use of renewable
energy, while 7% will only
vote for a candidate who
supports decreasing
the use of renewable
energy.
- 25%
will only vote for a
candidate who supports decreasing
the use of fossil fuels,
while 14% will only vote for
a candidate who supports increasing
the use of fossil fuels.

Additionally, we find that…
Most
registered voters think
global warming is causing
the cost of living to
increase:

Large, bipartisan
majorities of registered
voters oppose policies to
eliminate federal emergency
response and climate
research and information:
-
91%
say funding for the
Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA)
should either be increased
(49%) or kept about the
same (42%).
-
77%
oppose ordering all
federal agencies (such as
NASA, NOAA, and the EPA)
to stop doing research on
global warming.
- 77%
oppose ordering all federal
agencies to stop providing
information about global
warming to the public.

Majorities of registered
voters support state and
local climate-related
policies:
-
89%
support state laws
allowing residents to
install small plug-in
solar panels that directly
generate electricity for
their home.
-
65%
support requiring electric
utilities in their states
to produce 100% of their
electricity from clean,
renewable sources by 2050.
-
63%
support allowing states to
set higher fuel efficiency
standards than the federal
government for new cars
and trucks.
-
51%
support their city, town,
or county government
declaring global warming a
local emergency.
- 51%
support their governor
declaring global warming a
statewide emergency.

The full
report includes many other
important findings, including
special sections on data
centers and gas
prices as well as support
for transitioning
from fossil fuels to clean
energy, support for
various climate
policies (including
protecting people from
disproportionate harm from
environmental hazards, and
building local energy
infrastructure), priorities
for action on global
warming and clean energy by the
president and Congress, and
voters’ most
trusted sources of information
about global warming. |
|
|
For
media inquiries, please
contact Emily
Richards and Michaela
Hobbs.
For
partnership inquiries, please
contact Mallika
Talwar.
As
always, thanks for your
interest and support of our
work!
On
behalf of the research team:
John Kotcher, Seth Rosenthal,
Emily Goddard, Joshua
Ettinger, Teresa Myers,
Jennifer Carman, Marija
Verner, Julia Fine, Emily
Richards, Jennifer Marlon,
Matthew Goldberg, Edward
Maibach, and Anthony
Leiserowitz.
Cheers,
Tony
-----
Anthony Leiserowitz, Ph.D.
JoshAni-TomKat Professor of
Climate Communication
Director, Yale Program on
Climate Change Communication
Yale School of the Environment
(203) 432-4865
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthonyleiserowitz/
Bluesky: @yaleclimatecomm.bsky.social
climatecommunication.yale.edu
yaleclimateconnections.org
|
|
|
|
|
|