What drew me to the chart was how widely spaced the isobars were compared to the previous one, then I spotted the reason.
All back to normal this morning, I think. Looking again I assume the 961 relates to the low to the NW, not a shallow low associated with the occlusion it's next to. I'd ruled out the other low as I assumed the innermost isobar to be 976, which, of course it isn't.
Progress eh?
Graham
On Tuesday, 28 December 2021 at 03:39:43 UTC Tudor Hughes wrote: