Hello José,
Thanks again for your response!
Yes, I was hoping to not have to raise the limit for alerts so we can still get other valid alerts for rules higher than 10 (logged and e-mailed), just not from the specific known IP addresses of the security scanners.
Likewise with option #2, I don't think we'd want to ignore the triggered rules completely, but only for the specific known IP addresses of the security scanners. The triggered rules would otherwise be valid events from other source IP addresses. Also, that would likely mean ignoring a large percentage of the Wazuh rules that get triggered from the security scans, which would make Wazuh not very useful to use.
I will work on creating a GitHub issue soon for this.
In the meantime, I guess we'll just have to try and add overrides for the specific rules we find are getting triggered from the security scans, although this seems like an endless task and certainly not sustainable in the long run.
Regardless, thank you for your help.
--
Matt Vander Werf
HPC System Administrator
University of Notre Dame
Center for Research Computing - Union Station
506 W. South Street
South Bend, IN 46601
Phone: (574) 631-0692