Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Leveson Inquiry – Wanted- people who have had their evidence ignored
1 view
Skip to first unread message
RH
Feb 18, 2012, 9:40:54 AM2/18/12
to
Leveson Inquiry – Wanted- people who have had their evidence ignored
Posted on February 18, 2012
The Leveson Inquiry are refusing to use my evidence of press, PCC and
police misdoing. They will not even take up the matter of Piers
Morgan’s perjury before them despite the fact that I have given them a
letter from Morgan to the PCC in which he writes “ The police
source of our article (whose identity we have a moral obligation
to protect) gave us the detail of the letters that we then
published.” (http://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/piers-
morgan-lied-to-the-leveson-inquiry/) . My latest exchange of emails
with the Inquiry is below.
I am in contact with a published author who intends to expose such
behaviour by the Leveson Inquiry. He would like to hear from anyone
else who has submitted evidence to the Inquiry and believes that it
has been excluded for illegitimate reasons, for example, because it
would cause political embarrassment or require criminal proceedings to
be taken against those with power, wealth or influence.
Anyone who wishes to expose such refusals should email me on
anywh...@gmail.com and I will forward them to the writer.
Read more at
Posted on February 18, 2012
The Leveson Inquiry are refusing to use my evidence of press, PCC and
police misdoing. They will not even take up the matter of Piers
Morgan’s perjury before them despite the fact that I have given them a
letter from Morgan to the PCC in which he writes “ The police
source of our article (whose identity we have a moral obligation
to protect) gave us the detail of the letters that we then
published.” (http://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/piers-
morgan-lied-to-the-leveson-inquiry/) . My latest exchange of emails
with the Inquiry is below.
I am in contact with a published author who intends to expose such
behaviour by the Leveson Inquiry. He would like to hear from anyone
else who has submitted evidence to the Inquiry and believes that it
has been excluded for illegitimate reasons, for example, because it
would cause political embarrassment or require criminal proceedings to
be taken against those with power, wealth or influence.
Anyone who wishes to expose such refusals should email me on
anywh...@gmail.com and I will forward them to the writer.
Read more at
Message has been deleted
RH
Feb 18, 2012, 9:57:56 AM2/18/12
to
>
> Read more at
The url seems to have been lost. Here iot is again:
http://englandcalling.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/leveson-inquiry-wanted-people-who-have-had-their-evidence-ignored/
HardySpicer
Feb 18, 2012, 1:31:31 PM2/18/12
to
On Feb 19, 3:57 am, RH <anywhere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://englandcalling.wordpress.com/2012/02/18/leveson-inquiry-wanted...
I can imagine the New of the World wanting to expose Rab's doctor!
I can imagine the New of the World wanting to expose Rab's doctor!
HardySpicer
Feb 18, 2012, 1:30:32 PM2/18/12
to
On Feb 19, 3:40 am, RH <anywhere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Leveson Inquiry – Wanted- people who have had their evidence ignored
>
> Posted on February 18, 2012
>
> The Leveson Inquiry are refusing to use my evidence of press, PCC and
> police misdoing. They will not even take up the matter of Piers
because you are a lunatic!! I expect you don't get the vote either.
> Leveson Inquiry – Wanted- people who have had their evidence ignored
>
> Posted on February 18, 2012
>
> The Leveson Inquiry are refusing to use my evidence of press, PCC and
> police misdoing. They will not even take up the matter of Piers
Hardy
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Custos Custodum
Feb 19, 2012, 8:58:13 AM2/19/12
to
RH <anywh...@gmail.com> wrote in news:6729000b-a09c-4934-82e1-
d2ce3e...@i2g2000vbv.googlegroups.com:
> Leveson Inquiry – Wanted- people who have had their evidence ignored
>
> Posted on February 18, 2012
>
> The Leveson Inquiry are refusing to use my evidence of press, PCC and
> police misdoing. They will not even take up the matter of Piers
> Morgan’s perjury before them despite the fact that I have given them a
> letter from Morgan to the PCC in which he writes “ The police
> source of our article (whose identity we have a moral obligation
> to protect) gave us the detail of the letters that we then
> published.” (http://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/piers-
> morgan-lied-to-the-leveson-inquiry/) . My latest exchange of emails
> with the Inquiry is below.
>
> I am in contact with a published author
Obviously not you, then.
> who intends to expose such
> behaviour by the Leveson Inquiry. He would like to hear from anyone
> else who has submitted evidence to the Inquiry and believes that it
> has been excluded for illegitimate reasons, for example, because it
> would cause political embarrassment or require criminal proceedings to
> be taken against those with power, wealth or influence.
Throwing a tantrum because you've been dismissed yet again as an
attention-seeking crank? What will you do now? Squeak your indignation
on a '5 Live' phone-in?
d2ce3e...@i2g2000vbv.googlegroups.com:
> Leveson Inquiry – Wanted- people who have had their evidence ignored
>
> Posted on February 18, 2012
>
> The Leveson Inquiry are refusing to use my evidence of press, PCC and
> police misdoing. They will not even take up the matter of Piers
> Morgan’s perjury before them despite the fact that I have given them a
> letter from Morgan to the PCC in which he writes “ The police
> source of our article (whose identity we have a moral obligation
> to protect) gave us the detail of the letters that we then
> published.” (http://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2011/12/20/piers-
> morgan-lied-to-the-leveson-inquiry/) . My latest exchange of emails
> with the Inquiry is below.
>
> I am in contact with a published author
> who intends to expose such
> behaviour by the Leveson Inquiry. He would like to hear from anyone
> else who has submitted evidence to the Inquiry and believes that it
> has been excluded for illegitimate reasons, for example, because it
> would cause political embarrassment or require criminal proceedings to
> be taken against those with power, wealth or influence.
attention-seeking crank? What will you do now? Squeak your indignation
on a '5 Live' phone-in?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
RH
Feb 19, 2012, 3:33:36 PM2/19/12
to
On Feb 19, 6:39 pm, Malcolm <Malc...@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <Xns9FFEB2949F1EC6e912...@news.datemas.de>, soupdragon
> <m...@privacy.com> writes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Malcolm <Malc...@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote in
> >news:DAGzXSz7...@indaal.demon.co.uk:
>
> >> Interesting that Robert "the writer" hasn't a clue about how to operate
> >> his newsreader and so avoid making stupid errors like trying to post
> >> HTML into a text-only medium.
>
> >What's even more amusing is if you read Fatboi's 'train of logic' in
> >the link he gives to his web page. It runs like this.
>
> >In 1997 Piers Morgan refused to name a source that gave him the info
> >about Fatboi harassing the Blairs, to the PCC enquiry into Fatboi's
> >complaint. Fatboi concludes Morgan's refusal to name the source was
> >because he obtained it illegally.(Fatboi has no evidence to show that to
> >be the case, but that doesn't matter as far as he's concerned.)
>
> >2012:- Morgan gives evidence to Levinsonsaying that while he was editor at
> >the Mirror he never obtained information illegally.
>
> >Fatboi leaps to feet shouting at the TV that he is lying and he admitted it
> >in the 1997 hearing. He then writes to Levinson claiming Morgan is lying.
> >Levinson bin it as yet another crank.
>
> An admirable summary.
>
> Now let's see if Robert can refute it without recourse to his "doctor"
> or "nurse" :-))
>
> --
> Malcolm
Mr Plod at full intellectual stretch.... RH
> In article <Xns9FFEB2949F1EC6e912...@news.datemas.de>, soupdragon
> <m...@privacy.com> writes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >Malcolm <Malc...@indaal.demon.co.uk> wrote in
> >news:DAGzXSz7...@indaal.demon.co.uk:
>
> >> Interesting that Robert "the writer" hasn't a clue about how to operate
> >> his newsreader and so avoid making stupid errors like trying to post
> >> HTML into a text-only medium.
>
> >What's even more amusing is if you read Fatboi's 'train of logic' in
> >the link he gives to his web page. It runs like this.
>
> >In 1997 Piers Morgan refused to name a source that gave him the info
> >about Fatboi harassing the Blairs, to the PCC enquiry into Fatboi's
> >complaint. Fatboi concludes Morgan's refusal to name the source was
> >because he obtained it illegally.(Fatboi has no evidence to show that to
> >be the case, but that doesn't matter as far as he's concerned.)
>
> >2012:- Morgan gives evidence to Levinsonsaying that while he was editor at
> >the Mirror he never obtained information illegally.
>
> >Fatboi leaps to feet shouting at the TV that he is lying and he admitted it
> >in the 1997 hearing. He then writes to Levinson claiming Morgan is lying.
> >Levinson bin it as yet another crank.
>
> An admirable summary.
>
> Now let's see if Robert can refute it without recourse to his "doctor"
> or "nurse" :-))
>
> --
> Malcolm
Mr Plod at full intellectual stretch.... RH
Message has been deleted
HardySpicer
Feb 19, 2012, 5:29:03 PM2/19/12
to
this one for years - so funny!!
Did you really think that the News of the World were spying on you? ha
ha ha ha ha LOL!
tee hee hee hee hee...ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ROTFL!
Hardy
RH
Feb 20, 2012, 3:28:12 AM2/20/12
to
On Feb 19, 9:27 pm, soupdragon <m...@privacy.com> wrote:
> your own intellect was capable of little else even at full stretch.
A creature at full intellectual stretch.... RH
> > Mr Plod at full intellectual stretch.... RH
>
> We note your silence on the content and flight to ad hominem. Clearly
>
> your own intellect was capable of little else even at full stretch.
A creature at full intellectual stretch.... RH
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages