maybe things should be different

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Tshepang Lekhonkhobe

unread,
Jun 18, 2012, 2:39:35 PM6/18/12
to 670...@bugs.debian.org, LUK ShunTim, wa...@googlegroups.com
I instead think that NEW behavior should match the proposed behavior
of the other 2 (DESCRIBENEW and NEWDETAIL).

On another level, I even think that those other 2 commands should go,
in favor of NEW -v1 and NEW -v2 respectively, since they are simply
more verbose forms of the same. What you thiink?

LUK ShunTim

unread,
Jun 19, 2012, 1:21:42 AM6/19/12
to Tshepang Lekhonkhobe, 670...@bugs.debian.org, wa...@googlegroups.com
+1 to stay with the old behaviour.

As a matter of fact, I've downgraded to v2 for the time being.

Regards,
ST
--


Tshepang Lekhonkhobe

unread,
Jun 19, 2012, 1:32:41 AM6/19/12
to LUK ShunTim, 670...@bugs.debian.org, wa...@googlegroups.com
The new changes are now in VCS. You mind testing that version ($ wajig
readme wajig)? I've kept the old commands for now, and now they are
sort of aliases.

Tshepang Lekhonkhobe

unread,
Jun 19, 2012, 1:33:36 AM6/19/12
to LUK ShunTim, 670...@bugs.debian.org, wa...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:21 AM, LUK ShunTim <shunt...@polyu.edu.hk> wrote:
what is v2?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages