Comment on revision r4878 in wagic

1 view
Skip to first unread message

wa...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 25, 2013, 6:08:47 PM10/25/13
to wagi...@googlegroups.com
Comment by omegabla...@gmail.com:

Score: Positive

General Comment:
its actually
if blah then effect
ifnot blah then effect
no "("

For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/wagic/source/detail?r=4878

wa...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 26, 2013, 6:30:16 AM10/26/13
to wagi...@googlegroups.com
Comment by pank...@gmail.com:

General Comment:
Just to be sure that we are on the same wave:
by "if(ifnot) ... then may ..." I meant 2 possible structures:
"if ... then may ... " and
"ifnot ... then may ... ".

wa...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 26, 2013, 6:35:27 AM10/26/13
to wagi...@googlegroups.com
Comment by omegabla...@gmail.com:

Score: Positive

General Comment:
I know, but i so poorly documented these abilities that my explanations in
svn comments are all people have to go by. so when you write i fixed if( )
forum users see the parathesis and assume its a syntax change. i was just
clarifying just be careful not to shorthand people will assume its codble
like that
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages