Re: Architect OLAP designer

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Jonathan Fuerth

unread,
Jul 1, 2009, 9:28:41 PM7/1/09
to Steve Holub, wabit-de...@googlegroups.com
Hi Steve, thanks for this feedback. Here are my thoughts/responses:

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Steve Holub<st...@sqlpower.ca> wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Sam would really like us to use the power architect for designing cubes, but
> it still needs a little work.  Here are a few comments based on the mondrian
> schema:
> http://mondrian.pentaho.org/documentation/schema.php#Schema_files
> - When you create a new cube, it should only give you the option build it on
> an existing table (or on an aggregate table).

Actually, the Cube can be defined on a table, join or "view"
(arbitrary select statement). From section 3.1 of the file you
referenced:

The fact table is defined using the <Table> element. If the fact table
is not in the default schema, you can provide an explicit schema using
the "schema" attribute, for example

<Table schema=" dmart" name="sales_fact_1997"/>

You can also use the <View> and <Join> constructs to build more
complicated SQL statements.

> - When defining a dimension hierarchy's relation, it should then give you
> the table / view / join / inline table options.

Yes, we will do this. Do you need it ASAP?

> - Time dimension hierarchies should give me the option of defining the
> levelType.

I will try to make sure this is done soon!

> - Presently, I don't think you can add a degenerate dimension (a dimension
> without a dimension table - where the columns are found in the fact table).
>  This would be particularly useful when working with summary tables.

I *think* you can do this. Perhaps it's not obvious how to achieve it,
which I'd consider to be a bug. Let me double-check and get back to
you.

> These are the main issues, as far as I can tell.  I would say the top two
> being the time levelType and the dimension hierarchy relation definitions.
> Thanks guys,
> Steve

Thanks, Steve! We'll follow up on this.

-Jonathan

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages