NASA states that global warming due to the magnetic north shifting which is disrupting weather on planet Earth
Eddy
which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
The magnetic poles are not just shifting on Earth but every planet in
our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
atec77
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
CraigZ
Venus has weather. Mars has weather.
atec77
--
X-No-Archive: Yes
Sandgroper
Maybe you need to find out the difference between weather and climate.
The magnetic poles have shifted at least 3 times in the last few hundred
million years or so , at one stage , the south pole was in the Pacific
Ocean somewhere between NZ and Sth America.
--
Sandgroper
--------------------------------------------
Save planet Earth !
It's the only place that has Pizza and Beer
k...@kymhorsell.com
Jupiter's weather is visible from Earth. Mars has visible dust storms
and seasonal variation in colouration. Saturn's weather is along the lines
of balmy 135K and 500 m/s winds. Uranus is a stange case because
a pole points toward the sun. But we know it has "Roaring 40s" that are
killer, the tops of the clouds are around 73K and the snow is poisonous.
Neptune has cold snaps down to 55K with windspeeds up to 600 m/s.
--
[Help, my pattern matcher has developed socialistic tendencies!]
Mr. Robot is just another left wing alarmist.
-- Ed <ed.car...@ymail.com>, 19 Feb 2011 07:48 -0800 (PST)
bringyagrogalong
> CraigZ wrote:> On Mar 21, 8:16 pm,
> > atec77<ate...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> NASA states that global warming due to the magnetic north shifting
> >>> which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
>
> >>> The magnetic poles are not just shifting on Earth but every planet in
> >>> our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
>
> >> which other planets with weather ?
>
> > Venus has weather. Mars has weather.
>
> the question being whether the poster has a clue
And the answer to that is, no, you haven't!
But not a bad squirm to cover your stupidity after Craig sat you on
your ignorant arse.
jg
More likely your magnetic north has shifted.
i|||| | | || ||| || |||| 2.0
"Sandgroper" <woodb...@DROPKNICKERSgmail.com> wrote in message
news:BO6dnTBbqNGKuxrQ...@westnet.com.au...
> On 21-Mar-11 2:56 PM, Eddy wrote:
>> NASA states that global warming due to the magnetic north shifting
>> which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
>>
>> The magnetic poles are not just shifting on Earth but every planet in
>> our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
>>
>
> Maybe you need to find out the difference between weather and climate.
>
> The magnetic poles have shifted at least 3 times in the last few hundred million years
> or so , at one stage , the south pole was in the Pacific Ocean somewhere between NZ and
> Sth America.
More than that, they reverse often and move constantly.
The rocks have weather, the average is the magnetic field.
The pole direction is a sum of shifting fields rather than that of a fixed bar magnet, it
can go any way almost at random but probably not instantly, it isn't even necessary there
are two opposite each other.
There is no way at present to know when the next reversal or major fluctuation will
occur, except it has been quiet, too quiet.
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html
BTW a few hundred million years ago NZ and Sth america we near the current south pole
positon
600 million ago Australia was near the north pole position.
Thats physically on the globe, not the shifting magnetic position.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gondwana
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Australian_Plate
We can't do much about the herd of elephants in the room so lets ignore them and argue
about the colour of the curtains.
Gillard Lies
> NASAstates that global warming due to themagneticnorth shifting
> which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
>
> our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
And just by a happy coincidence I find this on the site of NASA -
supporter of the warmist AGW alarmists, so they absolutely *must* be
right:
"At the heart of our planet lies a solid iron ball, about as hot as
the surface of the sun. "
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html
This must be impossible according to bringnobrainalong, who insists
that a solid lump of rock like this could *not possibly* exist at
temperatures as high as the SUN! ROTFLMAO - He's just handed me
another Grand Slam victory without even having to turn up!
Worth repeating - ROTFLMAO!
bringyagrogalong
> E...@123.com (Eddy) wrote:
>
> > NASA states that global warming due to themagneticnorth shifting
> > which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
>
> > Themagneticpoles are not just shifting on Earth but every planet in
> > our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
>
> And just by a happy coincidence I find this on the site of NASA -
> supporter of the warmist AGW alarmists, so they absolutely *must* be
> right:
>
> "At the heart of our planet lies a solid iron ball, about as hot as
> the surface of the sun.
> "http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html
>
> This must be impossible according to bringnobrainalong, who insists
> that a solid lump of rock like this could *not possibly* exist at
> temperatures as high as the SUN!
True enough! A solid ball of iron on the other hand.....
> ROTFLMAO - He's just handed me
> another Grand Slam victory without even having to turn up!
Well who's the bloke who turned up and changed a solid ball of iron
into "a lump of rock".
But as we have seen on numerous threads, Oily just changes things as
he goes along.
Excuse me for a minute while I hold aloft my winners trophy.
> Worth repeating - ROTFLMAO!
Thanks, it saves me the trouble. LOL
k...@kymhorsell.com
...
> Well who's the bloke who turned up and changed a solid ball of iron
> into "a lump of rock".
And "as hot as the surface of the sun" is not all that hot, either --
between 5000-6000C.
But since iron boils around 3000C there is some interest in exactly
what state the core is in. The overall density of the earth is
not consistent with the core being just "normal" solid iron -- it's
significantly more dense.
But as for the magnetic field "causing" the earth's climate to change --
there is some evidence for that. Incoming energetic particles are
thought to form one source for condensation nucleii in the atmosphere --
there more "cosmic rays" the more clouds and the lower the surface temperature.
The Earth's mag field moderates how many particles reach the troposphere.
Measurements also show there is some effect related to variation in
cosmic rays (i.e. particles) from the sun and the average global temps.
--
Professor Freeman Dyson, World Renowned "Heir To Einstein" Physicist [...]
-- BONZO@27-32-240-172 [86 nyms and counting], 27 Feb 2011 12:50 +1100
Another problem that has to be taken seriously is a slow rise of sea level
which could become catastrophic if it continues to accelerate. We have
accurate measurements of sea level going back 200 years. We observe a
steady rise from 1800 to the present, with an acceleration during the last
50 years. It is widely believed that the recent acceleration is due to
human activities, since it coincides in time with the rapid increase of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere.
-- Freeman Dyson, "Many Colored Glass: Reflections on the Place of Life in the
Gillard Lies
> Gillard Lies aka that idiot Oily wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > E...@123.com (Eddy) wrote:
>
> > > which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
>
> > > Themagneticpoles are not just shifting on Earth but every planet in
> > > our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
>
> > And just by a happy coincidence I find this on the site ofNASA-
> > supporter of the warmist AGW alarmists, so they absolutely *must* be
> > right:
>
> > "At the heart of our planet lies a solid iron ball, about as hot as
> > the surface of the sun.
> > "http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html
>
> > This must be impossible according to bringnobrainalong, who insists
> > that a solid lump of rock like this could *not possibly* exist at
> > temperatures as high as the SUN!
>
> True enough! A solid ball of iron on the other hand.....
OK. Baby steps onece again for bringya.
What do rocks like meteors contain? Ans: *Iron*
Example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willamette_Meteorite
91% iron... a big lump of iron, which looks awfully like a "rock",
don'tcha think? <chortle>
And since you have conceded that such "rocks" _do_ originate in stars
(and our Sun is a star) you have shown yourself to be (yet agian)
totally worong in your claim that the Sun could _not possibly_ contain
rock.
Bloody hell, it's quicker to educate a monkey.
Game, set and match to me. (AGAIN)
> > ROTFLMAO - He's just handed me
> > another Grand Slam victory without even having to turn up!
>
> Well who's the bloke who turned up and changed a solid ball of iron
> into "a lump of rock".
Shit, I see like attracts like. Another cretin to educate.
> But as we have seen on numerous threads, Oily just changes things as
> he goes along.
>
> Excuse me for a minute while I hold aloft my winners trophy.
Er, that's the wooden spoon BTW.
>
> > Worth repeating - ROTFLMAO!
>
> Thanks, it saves me the trouble. LOL
It's OK. You can make a fool of yourself _as well_
Gillard Lies
> In aus.general bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> wrote:
> ...> Well who's the bloke who turned up and changed a solid ball of iron
> > into "a lump of rock".
>
> ...
>
> And "as hot as the surface of the sun" is not all that hot, either --
> between 5000-6000C.
>
> But since iron boils around 3000C there is some interest in exactly
> what state the core is in. The overall density of the earth is
> not consistent with the core being just "normal" solid iron -- it's
> significantly more dense.
Densities are even higher within the sun, of course, but the simpleton
bringnobrainalong, can not possibly perceive of factors such as
enormous pressures giving rise to states of matter not present under
"Earthly" conditions. The original reaction of this ignoramus was an
unequivocal statement that rocks could _not possibly_ exist in the
sun. I simply had to shoot down the voice of ignorance by
demonstrating that such a refutation was totally without substance -
but this is the case for most of his drivel. Job done, but thanks for
your further input to squash him. (It's not much of a challenge BTW)
LOL.
bringyagrogalong
> bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> eloquently wrote:
> > Gillard Lies aka that idiot Oily babbled:
> > > E...@123.com (Eddy) wrote:
>
> > > > NASA states that global warming due to the magnetic north shifting
> > > > which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
>
> > > > our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
>
> > > And just by a happy coincidence I find this on the site of NASA-
> > > supporter of the warmist AGW alarmists, so they absolutely *must* be
> > > right:
>
> > > "At the heart of our planet lies a solid iron ball, about as hot as
> > > the surface of the sun.
> > > "http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html
>
> > > This must be impossible according to bringnobrainalong, who insists
> > > that a solid lump of rock like this could *not possibly* exist at
> > > temperatures as high as the SUN!
>
> > True enough! A solid ball of iron on the other hand.....
>
> OK. Baby steps onece again for bringya.
>
> What do rocks like meteors contain?
That's easy, none.
Now off you go and find out what a meteor is before making an even
bigger goose of yourself. <chortle>
Gillard Lies
> Gillard Lies aka that idiot Oily waffled:
>
>
>
>
>
> > bringyagrogalong <sof...@aapt.net.au> eloquently wrote:
> > > Gillard Lies aka that idiot Oily babbled:
> > > > E...@123.com (Eddy) wrote:
>
> > > > > which is disrupting weather on planet Earth.
>
> > > > > The magnetic poles are not just shifting on Earth but every planet in
> > > > > our solar system which is changing the weather on other planets too.
>
> > > > And just by a happy coincidence I find this on the site ofNASA-
> > > > supporter of the warmist AGW alarmists, so they absolutely *must* be
> > > > right:
>
> > > > "At the heart of our planet lies a solid iron ball, about as hot as
> > > > the surface of the sun.
> > > > "http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html
>
> > > > This must be impossible according to bringnobrainalong, who insists
> > > > that a solid lump of rock like this could *not possibly* exist at
> > > > temperatures as high as the SUN!
>
> > > True enough! A solid ball of iron on the other hand.....
>
> > OK. Baby steps onece again for bringya.
>
> > What do rocks like meteors contain?
>
> That's easy, none.
answer the question noted.
> Now off you go and find out what a meteor is before making an even
> bigger goose of yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_meteorite
It even comes from your Wankipedia Bible on everything... so it _must_
be right! <chortle>
Another stunning match win to me. This is getting waaaaay tooooooo
easy. ROTFL