SetFieldMessage

[marmarti]

As you know we added a name field to the SetFieldMessage yesterday. Today we discussed the purpose of this message and we still think there is no need for a name being sent in more messages than the register message. So what we did right now is, we removed the name field from the SetFieldMessage (sorry for the frequent changes to the interface recently, this is the last _CHANGE_, i promise) and added a new message type, the NamedSetFieldMessage. This way you have the same functionality as with a named message, but if we decide in the next meeting, that the name is not at all needed, we can just remove the NamedSetMessageField. We really need to discuss where and when names are associated with clients. :-)

Have a nice day!