Download Spending By Johnny
Polo Barlow
That's all well and good, but it has now been revealed that Depp's love for vino just might have crossed the line from passion into straight-up crippling obsession. Just how crippling of an obsession are we talking about? How about spending upwards of $30,000 a month on wine?
Back in January, Depp sued his former business managers for "gross misconduct" and asked to be compensated $25 million. Earlier this week, The Hollywood Reporter published court documents it obtained in connection with that lawsuit; the documents revealed that the actor was living a lifestyle he allegedly couldn't afford, and was spending upwards of $2 million per month on living expenses. The court documents also revealed that Depp regularly spends around $30,000 a month on wine alone.
When not at the office, Johnny enjoys spending time with his lovely wife, Julie Beeks Stewart, who works as a public defender in Dorchester County. In addition to spending time with his wife, Johnny enjoys reading, listening to, and watching anything involving the Tennessee Volunteers
"I believe Mr. Isakson has, irresponsibly and immorally, voted to grow the federal government through debt spending to the detriment of young people and our country." Buckley said in an email. He later added: "He largely created the mess and then voted to fund what he created."
Buckley said Isakson voted for debt-bloating items like the war in Iraq and the Medicare prescription drug benefit and subsequently voted for debt-ceiling increases to cover the cost of the increased spending.
"Mr. Buckley is trying to mislead voters by citing debt ceiling votes (required for solvency) without citing Johnny's votes against trillions of dollars in unnecessary spending, including voting against a minimum of $5 trillion in debt ceiling votes alone, or his vote for the Budget Control Act, which cut spending by over $2 trillion and, according to the Heritage Foundation, 'has shrunk the size of government more effectively than any budget tool in a generation," Kilpatrick wrote in an email.
These data come from transparency reports disclosed by Google, and aggregated spending totals reported by Facebook and collected by the Wesleyan Media project. The time period for Google spending is from May 18th, 2018 to the present and the time period for Facebook spending is from January 1st, 2020 to the present.
The data displayed here are weekly spending totals collected from Google by the Center for Responsive Politics. Weeks displayed are for Sunday-Saturday, inclusive. CRP staff identify the candidates supported by each group.
Senator Isakson talks to an audience at the Atlanta Press Club about national priorities. He offers his view of social security, national debt, the tax code and government spending. He says that we have tough work to do and that this is the year to do it.
Minor's reliance on People v. Friscia (1993) 18 Cal. App. 4th 834 (Friscia), for a contrary result is misplaced. In that case, [100 Cal. App. 4th 1135] the defendant embezzled money from her employer, a private school. The authorities refused to prosecute the case until the school produced an accounting determining the amount of loss. The owners of the school prepared the accounting themselves, spending 222.25 hours searching records to determine the exact amount the defendant had embezzled. The defendant pleaded guilty to embezzlement and, pursuant to former Penal Code section 1203.04, fn. 6 the trial court ordered restitution in the amount of $47,000, which included $11,112.50 for the owners' time spent putting the case together for the authorities. (Id. at pp. 835-836.) The appellate court struck the restitution order, reasoning that the statute unambiguously limited "restitution" to " 'full or partial payment for . . . wages or profits lost due . . . to time spent as a witness or in assisting the police or prosecution[,]' " and the school owners did not lose any wages or ascertainable profits as a result of the time they spent making the accounting. (Id. at p. 837.)
760c119bf3