Download Orcad 10.5 Full Crack Link Mf ##HOT##
Fritzi Schlicker
Typically at my workplace I'll create a schematic in OrCad CIS and we'll send it out to company X to have a board routed. X then sends the routed board to us for approval. We tell them what we want them to rerout, they send a new board, and it goes back and forth like that until we get a board we can approve. So, my question is......is there an easy way to link the schematic and each new pcb for cross probing? I need to end up linking the schematic to, say, six boards.......same netlist of course, just different routing. The boards all have unique names. TIA.
Once you get the board back you will need to re-establish the netlist link between the board and schematic for cross probing. I would do this by regenerating the netlist in Capture and select "open pcb" down in the bottom right of the netlist window. This will make the netlist and open the board file allowing you to cross probe.
We still use a 3rd party to layout/fab our boards, but now I would like to know if there is a way to link a schematic and pcb other than generating a netlist from the schematic. I'm using 16.6-S018. Thanks!
I am having trouble linking a part to the database. When I try to link, all the other parts in my schematic get approved, but this one temporary part I created says "Temporary: Not approved", and gives me the error "Update part- Occurence..." and says that the database properties do not match my schematic properties. I even tried clicking "yes' for this to update the info. to my database properties, but nothing changes whether I click "yes" or 'no".
I use orcad 16 and if you drag a wire that crosses another wire where that wire connects to a component it will justifiably make a connection. Just ensure that dragged wires don't intersect at component terminations.
I have the OrCAD 16.2 suite and files that someone else made that I would like to edit. I can open the schematic in Capture and the PCB (.brd file) in PCB Editor, but do not know how to link the two so that I can make changes on the schematic and update the PCB accordingly.
Im trying to link parts in my schematic to parts in our CIS database. If there are multiple occurances of a part in the design, and I right-click on "Link Database Part", I think I am supposed to see a pop-up that prompts me to "Link to Selected Occurrences Only" or "Link all Occurances".
I never see this prompt, and I am only able to link to parts that I have manually selected.
Why does CIS not see that there are multiple occurances of a part in my design?
What are the criteria for multiple occuances of a part?
I also tried just creating a blank schematic and adding two identical parts. When I right click "Link Database Part", it just bring up Part Manager, but nothing about linking the DB part to multiple occurances within the design.
I am looking at an OrCAD library, discrete.olb in this case, and noticed that some of the symbol icons (which look like a little NOR gates) have a little line in them. I think they are somehow linked to another symbol in that same library because I tried deleting a symbol and another symbol with a little line was deleted as well. The example I am looking at is CAP NP and CAPACITOR NON_POL in the installed libraries.
There's LC input filter in my design, but I want to use 0Ohm for the inductor first. I tried to use variant design, but the part manager does not allow me to link a resistor part to a inductor part. Is this possible in Orcad CIS?
An Altium Designer Database Library provides library based links to those component definitions, which allows database sourced company components to be placed directly into designs, that are in turn synchronized back the data source.
The elementary database link mapping file for OrCAD CIS is a CIS Configuration file (*.dbc), and this is processed by the Import Wizard to create a corresponding Altium Designer Database Library structure (*.DBLib). The associated OrCAD library files (*.olb , *.llb), which are essentially the linked sources of component symbols and footprints, are also handled by the importer to create Altium Designer Library files (*.SchLib, *.PcbLib).
I have now definitively concluded that the problem is specific to the design I am working on. This design is based on a Xilinx reference design and the problem is present even in the unmodified reference design. I tried a different but similar Xilinx reference design and linking database parts in it is at least three times faster. It is still slow but it proves that the problem is with the design. One obvious difference between the two reference designs is that they were created with different OrCAD versions. I believe the one I used originally was created with OrCAD 16.6, and another one it seems with 17.2. So, why linking database parts works so slow in a design that was created in 16.6? I tried exporting the design to XML and EDIF formats and importing it back in a hope that that would clean it somehow but that didn't help. Any ideas would be highly appreciated. As it stands now, being productive when working with this design is basically impossible.
OK, perhaps the version has nothing to do with it. It was just a guess. What else could be the cause of the issue? The design must be corrupted in some mysterious way. If someone is willing to test it, here is a link to the reference design in question: -license.html?cid=bb488d1f-e81d-4316-b56d-49670e050702&filename=zcu111-schematic-source-rdf0464.zip (an account is required to download it). After opening the design go to a decoupling page, select 10 identical capacitors and try linking them to a database part. How long did it take? How long should it take?
The problem is that I have another issue that was caused by me experimenting with the capacitor symbol and making extra properties visible, and then experimenting with different font sizes and positions for them. It turned out that the schematics part of Capture doesn't agree with the symbol editor and if you try to use a different font size in the symbol it will be messed up in the schematics later. If you edit the property position in the symbol and update the symbol you end up with the property being displayed in both old and new positions. Strangely enough, everything seems to work when you place the component first time but then if you go back and change something in the symbol it all gets messed up and the only way to clean it is to re-link the database parts while having the checkbox for replacing the part 's schematic graphical representation and visible property locations checked. I don't think the methods you are proposing would help with that. Note also, that the linking time doesn't depend on this checkbox.
Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately, tracing was already disabled. I also found that if I try to link a few dozens of the parts at the same time the memory usage skyrockets and everything pretty much freezes forever. I have 32 GB of memory on my PC but I saw that Capture would commit 4 times that while linking a bunch of database parts! I am getting really frustrated as on the top of everything else the software occasionally crashes and even if I close it manually from a working state it leaves behind a bunch of processes and doesn't release the memory. A couple of years ago someone told me not to use versions above 16.something. Should I downgrade? Thanks.
Here's an example from our Capacitor database. When you set up your mapping file you will need to point to the entry for SYMBOL and PCB_FOOTPRINT. This is part of the walk-thru wizard.... That is all that CIS really needs and then it links your other key properties that you select back to the part. Needs to be unique such that CIS can find the part. Value is a property it will use but PART_NUM is too if I remember correctly
For starters, I need help to fill in or make a complete wiring diagram showing all necessary components.
The creator shows the PCB can be ordered by a fabricator and who that is, but the fabricator needs Gerber files to make the PCB and the creator doesn't seem to provide this even though he does provide codes for the Arduino and stepper motor (all linked on the webpage). I'd need OrCAD to make my own Gerber files and I don't feel like dropping $1,300 buying software that I'd rarely use.
A final issue is once the hardware is all set up, how exactly are the codes loaded into the hardware?
Building the machine physically is not a problem, neither is setting up the hardware/electronics. It's the missing components mainly and PCB fabrication secondly.
Has anyone built this machine before?
Sorry there is no direct way of importing Orcad into KiCad however indirectly it can be done. Check this link: How to import OrCAD designs to KiCad - Library Symbols - KiCad.info Forums I have not tried it but it sounds like it would work.
Thank you Ruilvia for your response. Perhaps I should have described in a different way that the video's creator does show where and who to have the PCB fabricated, but thank you for pointing out the link. I had already visited the JLCPCB website and that's how I found out they need Gerber files for fabricate the PCB.
I cannot indicate that the components are in the video. Other than seeing some small capacitors and what I think are two small pots, I have no idea. The video's creator leaves out some critical information. I've tried contacting the creator already, but have not received any response.
Thank you for directing me to KiCAD. I'll look it up.
Still, the essential problem is to know what are all the components on the PCB and incoporating them in the wiring diagram. From solving that, making the machine gets easier.
does anyone know how to link orcad schematic capture with allegro pcb layout? i would like to make changes in allegro layout and see the change reflects in my schematics immediately and interactively.
So what is it? Rather than storing part information in the symbol and linking to a footprint, a parts database centralizes all part information parametrically in a database with links to symbols, footprints, 3d models, datasheets, images, etc.
dd2b598166