Fwd: [void-discussion] Towards an update of VoID

Skip to first unread message

Richard Cyganiak

May 11, 2012, 1:09:16 PM5/11/12
to void-di...@googlegroups.com
Forwarding a response from Christoph Böhm (he's not on the list)


> From: "Boehm, Christoph" <Christo...@hpi.uni-potsdam.de>
> Subject: Re: [void-discussion] Towards an update of VoID
> Date: May 11, 2012 7:14:32 AM GMT+02:00
> To: Jun Zhao <jun.z...@googlemail.com>
> Cc: "void-di...@googlegroups.com" <void-di...@googlegroups.com>, Gregory Williams <gr...@evilfunhouse.com>, Michael Martin <mar...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
> Dear Richard et al,
> thanks for putting me in the loop.
> I absolutely agree that the adoption of VoID is a good argument for working on a next version.
> Also, I think that there are a few features that could be really helpful for the community when selecting and consuming linked data.
> For instance, in [11] the authors state (and I agree) "that there is currently no mechanism to capture the conceptual description of a dataset."
> This is part of what I would like to start thinking about.
> I would not want to "compete" with other vocabularies such as dcat, etc.
> Cheers,
> Christoph
> [11] P. Jain, P. Hitzler, P. Z. Yeh, K. Verma, and A. P. Sheth. Linked Data is Merely More Data. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence, pages 82–86, 2010
> ---
> Christoph Boehm, PhD Candidate, Information Systems Group
> Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Softwaresystemtechnik GmbH
> Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Str. 2-3
> 14482 Potsdam
> Amtsgericht Potsdam, HRB 12184
> Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Christoph Meinel

Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages