Dear Elsa,
well, we did not even include the possibility because this is not good practice. Ontology names (names as of URIs, and in particular the local name of the URI, e.g. “Person” in “http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person” ) need to be meaningful.
While an ontology may have labels in various languages, all the references to it, even when documenting, are usually made in terms of its URI (usually, in prefixed form, e.g. foaf:Person for “http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person” ).
It is the same rule as for computer programming: use meaningful names for variables and functions in order to make your code readable.
Thesauri stay on another level, they are meant to provide concepts that are kept as neutral as possible (and thus, using codes, possibly generated) and then the role of labels is fundamental.
Kind Regards,
Armando
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vocbench-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
vocbench-use...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/vocbench-user.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vocbench-user/f477297b-b417-4456-a722-08d3f3f61781%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.