ICV Concepts related disjoint relations does not work in VB3 v9.1

Jeannine Beeken

unread,

Aug 23, 2021, 9:43:17 AM8/23/21

to vocbench-user

Hi,

The ICV constraint

Concepts related disjoint relations
skos:Concept(s) connected to another with both the skos:related and the skos:broaderTransitive (skos:related relation is disjoint with skos:broaderTransitive)

does not seem to be working properly, see attachment. Could this be fixed, please. Thanks.

Best wishes,

Jeannine

ICV_BT_RT.PNG

Jeannine Beeken

unread,

Aug 23, 2021, 9:50:05 AM8/23/21

to vocbench-user

Hi,

Adding another screenshot to my previous comment. The attached screenshot ICV_Run_result gives no results after running the constraint, i.e. the anomaly is not detected by VB, hence the constraint is not working.

Best wishes,

Jeannine

ICV_Run_result.PNG

Armando Stellato

unread,

Aug 25, 2021, 4:47:45 AM8/25/21

to Jeannine Beeken, vocbench-user

Dear Jeannine,

I guess I know what happens: the ICV only checks specifically for skos:broaderTransitive, however skos:broader is a rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:broaderTransitive and should be checked as well (indeed, the transitive closure of skos:broaderTransitive should be checked, and this is another thing we are going to verify)

Thanks for your feedback, it’s on the fix list,

Kind Regards,

Armando

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vocbench-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vocbench-use...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vocbench-user/6faf2277-6cca-45f3-9d4b-25bcb5a24351n%40googlegroups.com.

Jeannine Beeken

unread,

Aug 25, 2021, 4:58:38 AM8/25/21

to vocbench-user

Dear Armando,

Thank you for fixing the issue. Will it be part of the next release?

Best wishes,

Jeannine

Armando Stellato

unread,

Aug 25, 2021, 6:06:51 AM8/25/21

to Jeannine Beeken, vocbench-user

Dear Jeannine,

for sure it will be part of the next major release. Most probably, it will be part of a next fix-release if we release one

Kind Regards,

Armando

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vocbench-user/ab748208-a9dc-440c-9786-45f71d9b797dn%40googlegroups.com.

Armando Stellato

unread,

Aug 25, 2021, 6:20:14 AM8/25/21

to Jeannine Beeken, vocbench-user

Update: fixed :-)

So it will be available in whatever the next version will be :D

Jeannine Beeken

unread,

Aug 25, 2021, 6:37:47 AM8/25/21

to vocbench-user

Great, thanks!

Jeannine Beeken

unread,

Apr 20, 2022, 9:57:47 AM4/20/22

to vocbench-user

Hi,

Recently, I tested the same constraint in version 10.2.1 and, indeed, this time the 'same' BT and RT were discovered as a violation. Thanks for fixing!