Hi Michael,
as you are
well aware, the unique uncertainty ID's managed by VNA Tools allows to keep
track of the whole traceability chain including uncertainties, correlations and
dependencies. If you do not take on board the correlation between the standards
the resulting uncertainties can easily be under- or over-estimated depending on
the used calibration schemes.
The drawback
is that the *.sdtab files, describing the calibration standards, can easily
grow rather large (even more than 100 MiB per standard).
There are
mainly four steps to tackle this problem:
1) Check under
VNA Tools, Options, Measurement Model: that the Small Unc Limit is set to its
default value of 1e-07 and NOT set to zero!
2) Reduce the Ecal impedance states files to S11 data only (might be 2-port measurements from the used characterization process).
3) Cut away
the dependencies by using the sdatcv or scolcv file format.
4) Reduce the
frequency resolution.
More detailed
information about the above mentioned points:
1) The Small
Unc Limit does cut away all uncertainty dependencies which are smaller than the
defined value.
This limit
should only be set to zero for didactical reasons as you have done it during the VNA Tools training course. Otherwise the uncertainty matrixes will just explode and the
file sizes will get very large using the settings you have described (like the
fine frequency resolution of 10 MHz).
2) I assume
that you have measured all Ecal states with a 2-port setup. Therefore also your
single impedance states measurements will consist of all four S-parameters (S11,
S21, S12, S22).
Reducing these files with the Change Port Assignment will allow you to reduce the
single impedance states data to smaller S11 data files only.
This is automatically done if you import a 2-port file to the database using
the 'Database, Create Database Standard functionality'. There you can define
the Ports you want to use for the 1-port impedance state of the characterized Ecal
unit.
3) If you
still run in computational resources issues then you can cut away the
dependencies by transferring the sdtab files in sdatcv files.
This will
generate much smaller files but keeps the important correlation information between
the Ecal states.
The scolcv
file format was specifically developed to save the definitions of a whole cal
kit (collection). The benefit of scolcv is that it can store multiple
calibration standards in a single file and it keeps the correlation between all
standards in that collection. That would be the ideal file format to store the
definitions of a mechanical calibration kit or electronic calibration units if
file size matters but access to the dependencies is not needed.
4) Normally
we recommend to characterize your transfer cal kits with the same frequency
resolution as you perform your production measurements. This will avoid any
additional interpolation steps.
The
calibration standards typically show a rather steady frequency response. Therefore
a very fine frequency resolution is not needed.
At METAS we
use the following standard frequency list for the characterization of the customer calibration kit standards:
9 kHz to 9.5 kHz in 0.5 kHz steps,
10 kHz to 95 kHz in 5 kHz steps,
100 kHz to 950 kHz 50 kHz steps,
1 MHz to 9.5 MHz in 0.5 MHz steps,
10 MHz to 95 MHz in 5 MHz steps,
100 MHz to 950 MHz in 50 MHz steps,
1 GHz to xx GHz in 100 MHz steps. (xx: upper frequency
limit)
Some general
remarks:
a) We would
strongly recommend to use all impedance states for an Ecal based calibration
and not select only a few states.
b) The
initial characterization of the Ecal unit, based on a traceable mechanical cal
kit, may result in rather large *.sdatb files. However, once you have created the smaller sdatcv files of your Ecal states, all further calibrations will produce much smaller file sizes.
At METAS we are using for the VNA measurements the following PC system: Win10,
64-bit, Intel Core i7-8700K CPU, 3.7 GHz, 32 GB of RAM. With this we have no
problems to manage larger sdtab file sizes for our customer based calibrations - even without cutting away the dependencies.
Only for our primary traceability calibrations we are using a special
designated system with more RAM and CPU power J
Hope this
helps and gives you an idea how you can tackle the large file size issues,
Juerg