Apologies Jim - we got somewhat wiped out today by not having any WiFi in the camp again, and our string-and-sealing-wax wifi keeps stealing all my emails :-)
If you're looking for something to do, we also have all the tasks that London didn't do today (see the April 2010 London page http://wiki.crisiscommons.org/wiki/Crisis_Camp_London_April_2010) - chief for me of which is the ChannelCode XSL task. I'm happy to send over all my files on this if you fancy creating an XSL stylesheet to turn an XML channels list into an RSS one :-)
|
----- Original Message -----From: Thomas MckenzieTo: Sara FarmerCc: Jim Cory ; virtualc...@googlegroups.com ; Kate Chapman ; ccl_...@tenbus.co.uk ; den...@crisismappers.netSent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 10:39 PMSubject: Re: London camp virtually
Hi Everyone,
I'm the point person for this for the Ushahidi-Haiti project at Crisis Mappers at Fletcher. I'd appreciate if questions came through me, if only because I didn't warn Antonio that folks would be contacting him for this, that he would be responsible for it all.
I'd be happy to clarify my notes/instructions for the lo-band site as well.
Thomas McKenzie
Tufts University, Class of 2011
thomas....@tufts.edu
----- Original Message -----From: Thomas MckenzieTo: Antonio LettieriCc: Alan McNeil Jackson ; Jim Cory ; Sara Farmer ; virtualc...@googlegroups.com ; Kate Chapman ; ccl_...@tenbus.co.uk ; den...@crisismappers.netSent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:02 PMSubject: Re: CC: Ushahidi low band initiative
Hi Everyone,Would it be possible to get a very brief update by Sunday or Monday? I'm curious about things like: did Aptiva take the lead? Is Jim Cory still involved? Have you run into any snags I can help with? Etc. I just want to track progress, that's all.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Antonio Lettieri <alet...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,Sorry about the confusion on the project. I will try and fill you in best as possible.From my understanding, the "client" would be any response team (be it humanitarian, military, government, etc.) utilizing Ushahidi's incident reports during or post emergency.Really the goal of the project is pretty simple.The Form will contain three specific filters:The form simply needs to be intuitive and of course accessible in low bandwidth locations, with the potential of being mobile accessible as well.
- Starting Date (reports since)
- Latitude and Longitude Coordinates
- Categories (one or more categories to filter by)
- Categories will be filtered by ID.
- Design some convention that allows the Ushahidi platform to consume and filter by multiple ids (comma separated perhaps).
- We need to coordinate the ids with the Ushahidi Platform.
Results can be viewed as:
- RSS formatted (feed)
- KML,( which may not be necessary for this phase).
At the time we were going to use the feed functionality of the Ushahidi platform.It was the fastest way we came up with at the time for gathering some form of reports without having to make too many changes/additions to the platform.The form was intended to post to the Ushahidi platform with query string parameters that will return filtered incident results:http://haiti.ushahidi.com/feed/?c=[id or ids]&lat=[latitude]&lon=[longitude]&date=[date_range]The javascript portion is simply for progressive-enhancement (help with the intuitive portion), if you don't deem it necessary, feel free to leave it out.Your team can decide whether you want to simply start the project over or go with what is on GitHub.Please let me know if I need to elaborate a little more on the specifics of the project, I'm not sure how much you've been filled in on.You can also contact me via skype: alettieriTJ, please chime in if I have missed anything.Hope this help move things along and thank you very much for your contribution guys!-Antonio
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Alan McNeil Jackson <al...@aptivate.org> wrote:
Hi Jim, Thomas, Antonio and everyone,
Myself and a fellow colleague from Aptivate had a look at this at
CrisisCamp (London) yesterday.
We read the document and downloaded what was on github. It was hard to
tell where it's at, what are the next steps and if someone was actively
working on it.
We didn't try to make any changes but we do potentially have capacity to
look at this task during the week.
Once we understand the requirements and who is effectively the "client"
we could take a co-ordination or lead role on this if that's helpful.
Cheers,
Alan
Jim Cory wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Not sure when to stop copying everyone with this thread (maybe now I'm
> connecting to you). Antonio had posted the last version on github, so I
> thought he would have input. Not sure how these things work, team-wise.
> Assuming tasks are divided amongst available individuals with perhaps an
> agreed technical lead. Are you he or are you more of a coordinator.
> Looking for direction as to where to enter this task and lean into it.
>
> Thanks for any guidance. Not concerned about disarray - can handle most
> of it if good will intended.
>
--
Hi Jim,
It looks like a pretty good way of going about it from here! Can you keep notes on this, because we have several projects (including HDP) with similar low-bandwidth issues.
Thank you, and thank you for all this excellent work!
Sara.
|