I kinda figured you were. I found it while getting sidetracked with the Spanish accounts from 1562.
I would love to read a the translations of Juan Pardo and Bander's journals.
Some account of them can be found at:
Sorting fact from fiction is indeed the challenge.
I was just telling Mickey yesterday how frustrating it is to see so much erroneous information posted on-line.
Weeding through all the misinformation that is perpetuated over and over again by researchers who don't
bother to verify sources. It takes up so much time.
Big problem is that many of the documented "sources" ie. pre-internet published family histories are wrong.
This is why I don't have any of my genealogical information posted on-line.
I don't consider the census to be an accurate account of genetic relationships, as many families were formed from orphan adoptions, step-family mergers and indentured persons. And as census takers were paid by the head, they seldom even ventured up the holler to get information. Many times they simply asked the closest neighbor, "Who lives on up the road?"
I am not at the point of gathering copies of court documents for my own family yet.
I am still just gathering clues. I hope to plan a historical document search vacation when I am ready.
As I study the life of Gideon, I am finding numerous accounts of his life that have been
written from a variety of perspectives. The Presbyterians have one story, the Cherokee historians
tell a different tale and the political view can be skewed either way depending on the agenda at hand.
And I am searching for the truth, which may never be found.
Some say he brought religion to the Indians.
Some say he owned and operated a whiskey distillery.
Some say he sold whiskey to the Indians.
Some say he was an agent for the Kentucky Temperance Society.
This is just an example of the contradictions I am finding.
Of course, all could be true, if he were to turn out to be a true capitalist.
For example, as per your document on the laws of the time, Gideon, being a clergyman, would be exempt from taxes.
As the owner of a distillery, he would need labor to grow corn.
As an educator to the Indians, he would be training the labor he needed.
Selling whiskey to the Indians would be profitable.
Being part of the Temperance movement would not only disguise his involvement,
but the guilt created by preaching the evils of drinking would create more converts,
which would mean more donations to the church.
Plus, if prohibition came, it would drive up the price of the whiskey, which would increase profits.
Sounds like capitalism at its finest.
Diana
Diana's Books
307 Main Street
Narrows, VA 24124