Future Bounce Sample Pack Free Download

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Karri Weston

unread,

Jul 31, 2024, 2:45:51 AM7/31/24

to vimasedi

The free future bounce loops, samples and sounds listed here have been kindly uploaded by other users for your commercial and non-commercial use on a royalty free basis (subject to our terms and conditions). If you use any of these future bounce loops please leave your comments.

For details on how you can use any loops and samples (including details on the specific licences granted by the creators of loops), please see the loops section of the help area and our terms and conditions. If you have any questions about these files, please contact the user who uploaded them. If you come across any content that is in breach of copyright or our upload guidelines please contact support.

future bounce sample pack free download

Download Zip ✸✸✸ https://fenlaekdiaho.blogspot.com/?mu=2zU9fN

Jay Eskar Future Bounce Essentials soundbank is a complete arsenal of 31 presets for your next Future Bounce production.This bundle also contains a mind blowing future bounce template that will instantly increase your productivity and inspiration.The concept behind this collection was inspired by Future Bounce innovators like Jordi Rivera, Curbi, Mesto, Mike Williams, Martin Garrix and was designed to compete with the current chart-topping trends.If you are looking for an impressive and thrilling collection for your next Future Bounce hit, this pack is for you!HERE`S EXACTLY WHAT YOU`RE GOING TO GAIN.31 Xfer Serum Presets12 Leads16 Basses2 Plucks1 FX(4 Macros on some presets)*Bonus items*Future Bounce Fl Studio Template100% Royalty-FreeXfer Serum 1.113 or higher is required to use the presetsFl Studio v12.3.1 or higher is required to open the template

Brooks, Mesto & Mike Williams Inspired Future Bounce Sample Pack.
Samples, Loops & Presets.
with this innovative pack of sounds, inside you'll find some top notch future bounce samples, sounds, loops and presets (for serum, spire and sylenth1).

Royalty Free license to use these samples in any commercial or non-commercial musical composition, which means you can sell music you have composed using these sounds and we never ask you for any royalty payment for usage of these samples, nor crediting us or any person/group.

Subscribe for more FREE Sounds

Fulton EA, Newby K, Kwah K, et al. A digital behaviour change intervention to increase booking and attendance at Stop Smoking Services: the MyWay feasibility RCT. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Apr. (Public Health Research, No. 9.5.)

Process interview participants comprised (1) smokers who had taken part in the main study who were willing to participate in an interview, and (2) professional staff from the pharmacies offering SSS appointments and two of the recruitment settings, including GPs and practice managers and staff from local community services.

To assess the best method for recruitment in a potential future definitive RCT of StopApp, recruitment across three settings was trialled. The settings were recruiting (1) via participating GP practices at which smokers were registered, (2) via advertising and information provided in community services and settings, and (3) via SM channels.

The eNgage system was programmed to provide individual-level data about StopApp use from Matomo ( ; accessed March 2021) web analytics software. This allowed us to access individual participant-level information about whether or not StopApp was accessed, and how long participants spent on each page of the intervention, including whether or not they reached the booking confirmation page.

Two months after each participant had been recruited to baseline and randomised, eNgage automatically sent them an e-mail with a request to complete an online follow-up questionnaire. Reminders to complete the questionnaire were sent again 2 weeks later. No further attempt to collect follow-up measures was made. Researchers checked that the automated procedures were functioning as planned, with no problems detected.

At the 2-month follow-up, participants were asked to provide self-reports of current smoking behaviour, any SSS appointment bookings made and how they were made (e.g. StopApp, booked with their own GP), and attendance at SSS in the last 2 months, quit dates set and if 4-week abstinence had been reached. Questions about resource use were also given to those who reported any service use, to verify costs to individuals and the public purse in conjunction with using StopApp compared with the control. This included costs and resource use associated with promoting the intervention and usual care (e.g SM marketing, bus advertising), delivering the intervention (e.g. web hosting, text messages) and delivering usual care (e.g. telephone calls to book appointments).

Participants were asked at the end of the baseline survey whether or not they would be willing to participate in an interview about their trial experience. Willing participants provided contact details. To ensure that a cross-section of views was captured, a sample of approximately 20 participants was targeted, with participants from both arms and different demographic groups represented. The intention was to oversample participants from more deprived backgrounds, as measured by their IMD scores and quintiles. This was to ensure that any factors potentially associated with deprivation (which may have influenced engagement with the intervention or the research process) were fully explored.

Based on RCT data investigating the recruitment of smokers to SSS via letters from their GPs,46 we would need to enrol 980 smokers to detect a 7% difference in attendance at SSS between control and intervention arms in a definitive trial. Based on this estimate, any trial would need to recruit 1.8 participants per day in total to achieve the required recruitment in 18 months. We planned to recruit for 3 months in a single LA provider of SSS, requiring one-sixth of the sample and providing a target of 162 participants in this time frame.

To assess the health equity of the study methods, we report on the spread of age, sex, ethnicity and SES represented in baseline recruits; those who completed follow-up and those who did not; and the differential attrition by sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.

To assess the feasibility of accessing SSS data on booking, attendance, quit dates set and 4-week quit rates, we report on the challenges experienced around data access. We also report rates of booking, attendance and quit rates from both the self-report data and the objective data, and have calculated the event rate of booking in the intervention arm in support of a future trial sample size calculation.

Data analytics software (Matomo) was used to measure the attrition rate at intervention access and the level of engagement with the intervention. This software enabled us to observe the number of StopApp pages viewed, where participants exited and the interactions they had with the intervention, including button clicks.