https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/10071
(6 files)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
Merging #10071 (c53ee0a) into master (c4cb544) will decrease coverage by
79.99%.
The diff coverage is0.00%.
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #10071 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 82.00% 2.01% -80.00% =========================================== Files 167 152 -15 Lines 187458 170589 -16869 Branches 42236 39471 -2765 =========================================== - Hits 153733 3430 -150303 - Misses 21369 166464 +145095 + Partials 12356 695 -11661
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| huge-clang-none | ? |
|
| huge-gcc-none | ? |
|
| huge-gcc-testgui | ? |
|
| huge-gcc-unittests | 2.01% <0.00%> (-0.01%) |
⬇️ |
| linux | 2.01% <0.00%> (-81.95%) |
⬇️ |
| mingw-x64-HUGE-gui | ? |
|
| windows | ? |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/dict.c | 4.21% <0.00%> (-80.44%) |
⬇️ |
| src/evalfunc.c | 0.00% <0.00%> (-90.90%) |
⬇️ |
| src/libvterm/src/rect.h | 0.00% <0.00%> (-96.78%) |
⬇️ |
| src/sha256.c | 0.00% <0.00%> (-96.45%) |
⬇️ |
| src/libvterm/src/parser.c | 0.00% <0.00%> (-95.91%) |
⬇️ |
| src/gui_gtk_f.c | 0.00% <0.00%> (-94.72%) |
⬇️ |
| src/crypt_zip.c | 0.00% <0.00%> (-94.12%) |
⬇️ |
| src/vim9compile.c | 0.00% <0.00%> (-92.42%) |
⬇️ |
| src/debugger.c | 0.00% <0.00%> (-92.23%) |
⬇️ |
| src/eval.c | 0.10% <0.00%> (-92.14%) |
⬇️ |
| ... and 155 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c4cb544...c53ee0a. Read the comment docs.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
@yegappan pushed 1 commit.
—
View it on GitHub or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
ASAN reports a leak, perhaps something is not cleared on failure?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
@LemonBoy commented on this pull request.
In src/evalfunc.c:
> return; + if (argvars[1].v_type == VAR_DICT + && dict_has_key(argvars[1].vval.v_dict, "errmsg", -1))
Shouldn't this be dict_get_bool? if errmsg is present but set to v:false then emsgoff should not be set to false.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
ASAN reports a leak, perhaps something is not cleared on failure?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
@LemonBoy commented on this pull request.
In src/evalfunc.c:
> return; + if (argvars[1].v_type == VAR_DICT + && dict_has_key(argvars[1].vval.v_dict, "errmsg", -1))Shouldn't this be
dict_get_bool? iferrmsgis present but set tov:falsethenemsgoffshould not be set to false.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you commented.![]()