[vim/vim] What is the significance of "(after 9.x.yyyy)" in Vim history? (Discussion #18455)

Paul Ollis

unread,

10:59 AM (9 hours ago) 10:59 AM

to vim/vim, Subscribed

This appears for some patches in the Vim git history and also in the history available in the Vim help.

Having noticed against a fix I worked on, I became curious as to its meaning.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

zeertzjq

unread,

11:05 AM (9 hours ago) 11:05 AM

to vim/vim, Subscribed

It usually means that this problem only started happening at 9.x.yyyy.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Paul Ollis

unread,

1:38 PM (6 hours ago) 1:38 PM

to vim/vim, Subscribed

Thanks for the answer.

I assumed it was something more subtle since, for the case that prompted my question, the version 9.x.yyyy in question did not actually introduce the problem. I guess it was just a mistaken assumption in this case.