Everything looks more readable under ":colorscheme koehler" - I wrote the colorscheme for readability in the first place.
Example how things looked back in vim-8 after TOhtml: http://gott-gehabt.de/800_wer_wir_sind/thomas/Homepage/Computer/perl/theweeklychallenge-238-1.html
Vi IMproved 9.0, Included patches: 1-1378, 1499
Operating System: Debian 12.2 (just updated from 11.x)
terminal: xterm
value of $TERM: screen
shell: zsh-5.9
No response
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
I suppose this is essentially the same as #10449 which mentions several alternatives/solutions/work-arounds
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
btw: you mentioned two times the same link
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
My Linux xterm has $TERM set to xterm. Is screen correct for your setup?
What is the output of :set t_Co?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
The colors look correct for me (black background, cyan comments, etc). Is this some terminal issues?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
My mistake, I meant to use http://gott-gehabt.de/800_wer_wir_sind/thomas/Homepage/Computer/perl/theweeklychallenge-237-1.html as the "good" example.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
My Linux xterm has $TERM set to xterm. Is screen correct for your setup?
Since I'm running screen inside of xterm, yes this is correct / expected.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
I suppose this is essentially the same as #10449 which mentions several alternatives/solutions/work-arounds
Yeah, downloading the original koehler.vim into ~/.vim/colors solves it for me.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
What is the output of
:set t_Co?
t_Co=8
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
The colors look correct for me (black background, cyan comments, etc). Is this some terminal issues?
I don't know exactly what is in play here, but with TERM=xterm-256colors or TERM=xterm I also get no cyan comments if I don't use the legacy colorscheme.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
t_Co=8
While that is correct for a plain old xterm, I suppose you rather want to use xterm-256color (without the s) to have at least 256 colors available (which xterm supports for a very long time). I haven't seen a terminal that only supports 8 colors in years.
If you want to keep TERM=xterm for whathever reasons, you can also just set :set t_Co=256 in your .vimrc to force to use 256 colors.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
I supposed this can be closed now.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
Closed #13317 as not planned.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()
More appropriate is to make sure TERM makes sense and that the corresponding terminfo entry reports appropriate values. For example, with tmux I create a tmux-256color terminfo and use it for TERM inside tmux (forcibly assuming that the underlying terminal also supports it). I even enable some special things conditionally, including resetting Vim’s 'term': https://github.com/benknoble/Dotfiles/blob/42e735921210a6bc6da3932c0d88d54db613693e/links/vim/vimrc#L370 Arguably getting this right for tmux/screen is hard, because their info depends more on the combination of underlying term and the program itself.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.![]()