Test failure building 8.2.2395

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Elimar Riesebieter

unread,
Jan 23, 2021, 8:19:22 AM1/23/21
to vim...@googlegroups.com
Hi all,

building 8.2.2395 I get:

From test_fold.vim:
Found errors in Test_fold_relative_move():
command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 25: Expected 3 but got 2
command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 30: Expected 2 but got 1

Building within tmux. Using clang-11 as compiler. Platform -> Linux amd64

Elimar
--
Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge,
not the fountainheads ;-)

Dominique Pellé

unread,
Jan 23, 2021, 8:43:50 AM1/23/21
to vim_dev
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:19 PM Elimar Riesebieter <ries...@lxtec.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> building 8.2.2395 I get:
>
> From test_fold.vim:
> Found errors in Test_fold_relative_move():
> command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 25: Expected 3 but got 2
> command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 30: Expected 2 but got 1
>
> Building within tmux. Using clang-11 as compiler. Platform -> Linux amd64
>
> Elimar

I also see this test failure. I had created this ticket about it:

https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/7731

Glad it's not just me who sees this test failure :-)
Since not everybody sees the test failure, maybe
it's triggered by some build configs? I need to check
several build configs.

I hope to find time later today to look at it, at least
I want to look at the valgrind uninitialized memory in
the ticket (although it may be unrelated to the test failure).

Regards
Dominique

Bram Moolenaar

unread,
Jan 23, 2021, 9:15:54 AM1/23/21
to vim...@googlegroups.com, Elimar Riesebieter

Elimar Riesebieter wrote:

> building 8.2.2395 I get:
>
> From test_fold.vim:
> Found errors in Test_fold_relative_move():
> command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 25: Expected 3 but got 2
> command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 30: Expected 2 but got 1
>
> Building within tmux. Using clang-11 as compiler. Platform -> Linux amd64

I cannot reproduce it. Does valgrind say anything?

--
A scientist is someone who knows exactly how an engine works, but
can't fix his car when it fails to start.
An engineer is someone who knows only some things about an engine, but
can fix his car when it's broken.

/// Bram Moolenaar -- Br...@Moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///

Dominique Pellé

unread,
Jan 24, 2021, 8:12:08 AM1/24/21
to vim_dev
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> building 8.2.2395 I get:
>
> From test_fold.vim:
> Found errors in Test_fold_relative_move():
> command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 25: Expected 3 but got 2
> command line..script /source/vim/vim-8.2.2395/src/vim-gtk3/testdir/runtest.vim[468]..function RunTheTest[39]..Test_fold_relative_move line 30: Expected 2 but got 1
>
> Building within tmux. Using clang-11 as compiler. Platform -> Linux amd64
>
> Elimar

Hi Elimar

The failing test is fixed in vim-8.2.2399.

Regards
Dominique

Elimar Riesebieter

unread,
Jan 24, 2021, 8:28:02 AM1/24/21
to vim_dev
Hi Dominique,

* Dominique Pellé <dominiq...@gmail.com> [2021-01-24 14:11 +0100]:
8.2.2401 is running fine now. Thanks for cooperation. Much
appreciated ;-)

Elimar
--
You cannot propel yourself forward by
patting yourself on the back.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages