On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:41 AM Christian Brabandt <
c...@256bit.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Di, 12 Dez 2023, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>
> > Something has gone wrong again.
> >
> > Remember: tags v9.0.2140 to v9.0.2142 had gone missing, but tags
> > v9.0.2143 to v9.0.2155 had been set correctly. Well, now tags
> > v9.0.2156 to v9.0.2158 have gone missing again.
> >
> > This concerns only the Mercurial .hgtags metadata (and I don't know
> > about any git metadata). In all cases the src/version.c contains the
> > full list of patch numbers.
>
> Fixed. Not sure why this happened, the script did not receive a tag when
> processing the git revision. This could happen, if I push out a new
> patch, then the hg-bridge runs and a few moments later the tag is
> pushed. However, this shouldn't happen 3 times in a row, so it's a bit
> mysterious.
whatever it is called). Let's hope your fix catches it in the future.