ZyX wrote:
> Vim bindevalled scope dictionary has the same problem I reported for
> extend(). This patch fixes it, though with it case =93masks existing
> function=94 is indistinguishable with =93funcref variable must start with
> a capital=94. I can make them distinguishable with few more lines if
> needed (due to the existence of the first case I never assign function
> references to g: or l: variables and believe this is a very bad idea,
> thus it does not matter whether or not these cases are
> distinguishable).
Thanks, I'll look into it soon.
> Also note: while lua interface lacks funcref problems (yet?), it
> definitely makes it possible to have g:1 variable. I did not fix it
> because I do not know what should be done in this case (and am
> familiar neither with lua nor with its C API). Thus sending copy of
> this message to Luis Carvalho. Do not know whether some other
> interfaces have similar problems.
There are probably more like these..
--
The coffee just wasn't strong enough to defend itself -- Tom Waits
/// Bram Moolenaar -- Br...@Moolenaar.net --
http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features --
http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language --
http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims --
http://ICCF-Holland.org ///