When executing register contents using the :@ command, currently line
continuation is not supported. This is very useful for testing VimScript
snippets by yanking the contents to a register and then executing it.
https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/6272
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.![]()
Merging #6272 into master will increase coverage by
0.01%.
The diff coverage is88.57%.
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #6272 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 87.49% 87.50% +0.01% ========================================== Files 143 143 Lines 158429 158463 +34 ========================================== + Hits 138617 138669 +52 + Misses 19812 19794 -18
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/register.c | 91.54% <88.57%> (-0.09%) |
⬇️ |
| src/if_xcmdsrv.c | 88.73% <0.00%> (-0.18%) |
⬇️ |
| src/window.c | 89.62% <0.00%> (-0.11%) |
⬇️ |
| src/sign.c | 94.94% <0.00%> (-0.09%) |
⬇️ |
| src/message.c | 88.59% <0.00%> (-0.05%) |
⬇️ |
| src/gui_gtk_x11.c | 59.10% <0.00%> (+0.04%) |
⬆️ |
| src/gui.c | 64.07% <0.00%> (+0.15%) |
⬆️ |
| src/os_unix.c | 70.90% <0.00%> (+0.22%) |
⬆️ |
| src/netbeans.c | 76.59% <0.00%> (+0.22%) |
⬆️ |
| src/profiler.c | 93.03% <0.00%> (+0.55%) |
⬆️ |
| ... and 1 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c70222d...34cd42d. Read the comment docs.
I'm wondering if this is really something we should encourage to be used. In a :def function it's now possible to omit the line continuation, especially for a list and dict. Why not use a :def function instead? It's not fully stable yet, but this pull request is also new.
I'm wondering if this is really something we should encourage to be used. In a :def function it's now possible to omit the line continuation, especially for a list and dict. Why not use a :def function instead? It's not fully stable yet, but this pull request is also new.
Hmm, OK. Would be good to add a remark in the help somewhere, with a hint that this is mainly for trying out a part of a Vim script, not for normal use.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.