https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/5471
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.![]()
Merging #5471 into master will increase coverage by
<.01%.
The diff coverage isn/a.
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5471 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 82.87% 82.87% +<.01% ========================================== Files 134 134 Lines 147944 147944 ========================================== + Hits 122608 122615 +7 + Misses 25336 25329 -7
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/terminal.c | 81.81% <0%> (-0.04%) |
⬇️ |
| src/window.c | 88.44% <0%> (+0.13%) |
⬆️ |
| src/gui.c | 63.63% <0%> (+0.15%) |
⬆️ |
| src/if_xcmdsrv.c | 86.35% <0%> (+0.17%) |
⬆️ |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7ebcba6...63babeb. Read the comment docs.
The paths in Makefile are for the current directory when following the instructions, they are not relative to the Makefile itself.
Why remove the section for "Terminal support"?
@shaneharper pushed 1 commit.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Alright, I'll include it then.
Closed #5471.
Shane Harper wrote:
> I believe
> copy runtime\* vim82
> should be replaced by
> xcopy /e runtime\* vim82
> in src/INSTALLpc.txt.
>
> The original copy command won't copy subdirectories while "xcopy /e" will.
Shouldn't that be:
xcopy /s runtime\* vim82
Shane Harper wrote:
> > > I believe
> > > copy runtime\* vim82
> > > should be replaced by
> > > xcopy /e runtime\* vim82
> > > in src/INSTALLpc.txt.
> > >
> > > The original copy command won't copy subdirectories while "xcopy /e"
> > will.
> >
> > Shouldn't that be:
> > xcopy /s runtime\* vim82
> >
>
> Both "xcopy /s" and "xcopy /e" copy subdirectories - however only "xcopy
> /e" copies empty directories. (When copying the current runtime directory
> both "xcopy /s" and "xcopy /e" will effectively do the same thing.)
The MS docs say that /e only works in combination with /s. But the docs
might be misleading.