Canthe writer use a title like that? (from your post I understand
the book is already out there). Because there is no Indian epic
called Ramayana, the poisonous tree.For instance, If one writes a critical study on Shaw's 'Pygmalion',
one can discuss Shaw's style, the story, the effect of the book on
English language, on the society, theater etc.
But can one give the book a title such as 'A critical study of an
English Drama: Pygmalion, the pompous professor' or 'A critical study
of an English Drama: Pygmalion, and the guttersnipe'?I don't think so. What is your opinion?Regards
Lyla.
Courtesy:
So glad you brought up this writer's name couple of times and
brought up his quips.
I regret I never had the chance to be in his class room.
To me - he is a fantastic writer. I enjoyed some of his works as
cheliyali katta, terachiraju, ekavira, veyipadagalu,kinnerasni...,
before leaving India. Thanks to my sister, I have a few more of his
books now.Regards
Lyla.
In 1975-76 or so, the first edition of RAMAYANA VISHAVRUKSHAM PART - I is published. Subsequently other volumes are also published. Now this book, RAMAYANA - A POISIONOUS TREE is the translation of those telugu books. I am surprised you are asking this question now.Anyway, yes, one can understand the real meaning of any book and write criticism with the actual meaning. People who believe in Ramayana also wrote, "Ascarya Ramayanam", "Adbhuta Ramayanam", etc. using the same RAMAYANAM while adding their own story/material.This process exists in the literary world, whether or not one likes it.Regards,Satyanarayana
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
చాలా బాగా చెప్పార! మరి అసల ఎన్ని రామాయణాల లోకలో
ప్రాచర్యలో వన్నాయో కడా పేర్కని వటే బాగడేది. పనిలో పనిగా
ఆ "అసల సిసలైన" రామాయణాల ఎక్కడ దొరకతదో తెలపగలరా!
> ప్రక్షిప్తాల మలకథని ఎప్పడ మార్చవన్న మఖ్య
> విషయాన్ని బాగా అర్థ చేసకోవాలి.
> పస్తకాల చదవకడా ఏదో మాట్టాడ్డానికి ప్రయత్నిచడ
> సరైన పద్ధతి కాద కదా!
_on_vishavruksham.htmThe above link mentions that the news item appeared in Hindustan Times
on 14th February 2000.
I certainly saved the webpage at that time, which seems to be on one of
those backup CDs. Otherwise, you 'd be able to dig at: web.archive.orgRegards,
Sreenivas
Courtesy:
Sri. Satyanarayana Veeramachineni corrected the link he originally
gave us to the article. Apparently, the original link he provided to
us has worked earlier. The following is the link where the article
can be accessed now... which I verified personally. _949887,0015002200000017.htmI accidentally pressed the 'reject' button instead of 'accept' to his
mail. I regret the error.Satyanarayana gaaru, please add any comments you may have in addition
to providing this link.Thanks
-Akkiraju
(One of the moderatores coming back alive(hardly as you see:-))
Courtesy:
exercises that one has to undertake to reach the article from here,
it would be helpful. I have already tried searching for it on the site using the key
words "ramayana" and vishavruksham" without achieving the desired
results. Am I missing something?Thank youWith kind regardsanother satyanArAyaNaCourtesy:
This could be one way of looking at it. If one has to look from a materialistic view yes, each God, depending on his/her/its(some gods are in a mixed form of half human and half animal-hence it) materialistic wealth has to be given some security?Best wishes
Hemantha
"The sender believes that this E-Mail and any attachments were free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking proactive and remedial action about viruses and other defects. The sender's business entity is not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message or its attachments."
As usual many who campaign against her, are not going to read the book.Why?My theory is that they are afraid they may be convinced
by the book, thereby shattering the security of their cherished beliefs :-)-srikanthCourtesy:
First, many thanks - for taking the time to share the books and
authors you like. I have made notes, which books to get. I am also
going to request DTLC - to look into your list and consider some for
our next year's book reading.The short story of 'Ari' in Telugu Naadi, that you mentioned above
must be 'kottha oopiri' Right? Can we do a little discussion on this
story?The writer remained unbiased, but I can't. I don't like that heroine
Kamala. She is turning into 'Madame Bovary'. She is finding fault
with a hard working husband David, and accuses him of having no life.
Now she will go to Banglore,(all the time crying, sure!) to be with
Venkat, who of course is such an understanding guy. I bet - pretty
soon Kamala and Venkat will be sitting in three Aces restaraunt,
eating tandoori chicken with David's money and will discuss Picasso
and Matisse. Now and then they will pity David, that he is a -koopa
koormam- and knows nothing about life.SatyaNarayana garu, I am biased towards David in this story, and
think Kamala is a bored brat and Venkat is a gold digger. :-)Regards
Lyla.P.S. Manju! you said you read 'Ari's stories. What did you think of
this one?
may be some other friends have some comments.
3a8082e126