Wild Willy
unread,May 9, 2021, 12:30:58 AM5/9/21Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Video Download Helper Google Group
You've got the same speed connection that I used to have. I understand the problems you can face.
Even though I now have a much faster connection, I have found that most sites do indeed throttle
their service. That makes sense since a site couldn't afford to let one or a few users monopolize
their capacity. But YouTube is easily the worst of all. The stuff I download from there uses no
more bandwidth than I used to get on my slow connection.
With a slower connection, you can still launch a bunch of downloads to run concurrently & each one
will get only a fraction of your overall bandwidth. And those fractions aren't usually equal. It
seems like some downloads get a larger fraction than others running at the same time.
Nevertheless, you can run a bunch of downloads at the same time & watch each of them take hours.
Or you can run them in single file & they'll probably add up to the same aggregate time. This
really has nothing to do with VDH parameters. VDH uses whatever bandwidth you have & there's
nothing you can do to make things download faster.
Now, when you start talking about aggregating & converting, that has nothing to do with bandwidth &
everything to do with your hardware. You'll have to experiment with the relevant VDH multitasking
parameters to see what works best on your system. I have found that in general, if either of those
processes requires more than a few seconds, your CPU will go to 100% usage for an extended period.
I have found that on my Windows 7 system, it remains responsive despite the extreme CPU usage. But
every system is different so you'll just have to experiment.