Well it wasn't a few moments but . . . Can't be helped.
I decided to trawl through the jsons. When I stumbled on this one (see the attached
image), I said this looks interesting.
Cute trick I just discovered. If you click the mouse once on one of those URLs in the
right part of the Network Monitor, in the Response area, it transforms the URL into a
text field with your cursor positioned at the end. So then do Shift+Home to highlight
the whole thing. Then do Ctrl+Insert to copy it to the clipboard. Then go over to your
text editor & do Shift+Insert to paste the URL into . . . oh I don't know . . . an
invocation of ffprobe perhaps, just picking something completely off the wall.
I'm attaching the ffprobe reports for those 2 URLs. Two reports in one file. The DASH
report is still the same trash from my preceding post. But the HLS report is golden.
Plus, the captions are recognized. So I got the 51-minute video. In a separate
download, I got the captions. The logs of those downloads are also attached to this
post. Each log shows how long the download took & what download speed I was getting.
The download of the captions was strangely slow like a snail. Weird. But captions are
typically small text files, this being no exception, so the captions actually downloaded
in a relatively short time. The serving web site gave pretty good download speed for the
video. Not spectacular, but a tremendous lot better than YouTube.
So it turns out that this is a tricky case. On the surface, this looks like a DASH
stream. Only the DASH manifest is showing up directly in the Network Monitor. That
probably explains, as mjs said, why VDH has trouble with this one. VDH is known to be
unable to handle DASH streams. But with a little digging, you can find more information.
It turns out that this is actually an HLS stream. I don't think VDH would have processed
this HLS master manifest correctly even if it had found it. There's 6 video tracks of
various resolutions sharing a single audio track. That's another pattern that VDH is
known to have trouble with. Then there's the captions, which VDH doesn't handle in any
way.
The video played great in VLC. It's a 1920x1080 video & the bit rates are, surprisingly,
well above average. So the quality of the image is pretty good in addition to it being a
full HD resolution. I began watching it to see how good the captions were & ended up
watching the whole thing. Which is why this post is so late. Fascinating talk. I think
the captions might have been machine generated. There were a lot of mistakes in them but
they were good enough . . . if your mother tongue is English. If you aren't an English
speaker, or at least not fluent in English, the captions will make very little sense in a
lot of places. There's a lot of words in the captions that kind of sound like what he
was saying but they're actually gibberish. If this guy were speaking French, I would not
have understood him, & my French is pretty good. Even with French captions, if they were
as full of mistakes as these English captions are, I'd be in a world of hurt. It would
probably take me at least 2 days to fix these caption, something I'm not about to do.
But that's a digression. Hadidi, if you really want to understand what I did, you're
going to have to read this:
https://groups.google.com/g/video-downloadhelper-q-and-a/c/sNfTCMYfiTU
The title of that thread mentions "too fast" but that is only one of many uses of that
thread. You need to read it carefully, including the references to secondary discussions
whose links are within that one. There's no shortcuts. Either you are motivated to
learn & you are motivated to get your videos . . . or you aren't. It's your choice.