Search And Seizure
And The NSA
By Ron Branson
National JAIL4Judges Commander-In-Chief
12/24/2013
One of the more controversial issues of the
day is that regarding the National Security Agency (N.S.A.),
namely, the seizing of everyone's telephone and internet
communications. Just this last week surprisingly 60 Minutes
was granted an interview of the NSA. One of the questions
presented to the NSA was regarding how many public interviews
the NSA has conducted over the years. The response given was
one, only this current one. Obviously, the NSA is concerned
over its own privacy, and the only reason they granted this
interview with 60 Minutes was because so much public heat has
been directed towards the NSA over the recent Snowden exposure
of its collection of information on every American citizen in
this country.
It was interesting to listen to their excuses and their
defenses for their actions. First off, they claim they are
gathering such information for the defense and the protection
of this nation against terrorist worldwide. While they admit
to gathering such information against all Americans, they
claim they do not sift through it personally except in
connection with foreign intelligence. But even here, they
admit to sifting through such personal data of foreign
potentates, such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel. She is
not even remotely suspected to be connected with foreign
terrorism, or the overthrow of America, foreign or domestic.
In fact, the nation of Germany is determined to be a friendly
nation toward the United States. Nonetheless, we have provided
to her just cause to be hopping mad over being personally
monitored by NSA snooping into her personal affair and
conversations. What is really happening is we are straining
our relations with those who have established most favored
nation status. It can't be helped for one to wonder if Barack
Obama would be hopping mad to discover that all his personal
and confidential communications were being monitored by
governments around the world who hold most favored-nation
status.
NSA claims they are abiding by their Oath to faithfully
observe the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution which says,
"The right of the People to be secure in their Persons,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and
seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue,
but upon Probable Cause, supported by Oath or Affirmation, and
particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
Persons or things to be seized." (December 15, 1791).
NSA says there is a FISA judge issuing the warrants for their
clandestine activities. Further, they claim that when they
have acted in the absence of a court warrant, these were only
actions conducted through mistake and by error of their
employees. Hence, violations of their Oaths to faithfully
observe the Fourth Amendment must be excused based upon human
error, as they are handling such massive volumes of
information on so many People. In such cases they have been
found to gather personal and private information on ex spouses
and girlfriends, etc.
But, as John Wolfgram, a personal acquaintance of this author
for many years, points out, while most criticism and defenses
put forth regarding NSA is based upon the "Search" aspect of
the Fourth Amendment, the real violation of their Oaths of
Office is based upon the "Seizure" aspect of the Fourth
Amendment. NSA claims the information gathered on Americans is
not personally sifted through for particulars, but they are
only holders of such information just in case they should need
it in the future. NSA claims they can go back at least five
years on every person in America when the FISA Court is
satisfied that there exists Probable Cause regarding any
person. But Wolfgram raises the issue of how they came of such
information in the first place rather than what might such
information prove. Did the FISA judge write out and issue
millions of warrants on every American in the "seizing" their
such personal information? Thus, the issue is, according to
Wolfgram, is not what are they going to do with all this
massive amounts of information they have collected on every
American,, but rather how did they come to possess such
information in the first place. NSA certainly did not ask the
permission of all Americans to gather their phone and internet
information.Neither was there Probable Cause established to
gather it.
Accordingly, such information must constitutionally be deleted
and removed from every NSA computer record unless they can
prove they first constitutionally sought for and did obtained
a lawful warrant for its seizure.
Ron Branson