Problem with ONVIF GetDeviceInformation

1,296 views
Skip to first unread message

David Robison

unread,
Feb 5, 2013, 3:22:37 PM2/5/13
to vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com
I have a Surveyor HD-13M and I am trying to discover it using ONVIF. I send the following command to the camera to request its device information.

POST /onvif/device_service HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset=UTF-8; action="http://www.onvif.org/ver10/device/wsdl/GetDeviceInformation"
User-Agent: Axis2
Accept-Encoding: gzip
Host: 192.168.111.182
Content-Length: 241
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
  <soapenv:Body>
    <wsdl:GetDeviceInformation xmlns:wsdl="http://www.onvif.org/ver10/device/wsdl" />
  </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>

and I get the following error:

<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>400 Bad Request</TITLE></HEAD>
<BODY><H1>400 Bad Request</H1>
Your client has issued a malformed or illegal request.
</BODY></HTML>

Any idea what I am doing wrong? David

Frank Jacovino

unread,
Feb 5, 2013, 3:34:30 PM2/5/13
to kc7b...@gmail.com, vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com

David,

 

First thing you could try is to open the web browser and check the system Information page. Confirm that the VMS mode is listed as ONVIF mode. If not then check SW1 pole 8 and make sure it is on.

 

Frank

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vicon Security Help Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vicon-security-hel...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereof)is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in it's entirety,whether in electronic or hard copy format. The views expressed in this communication may not necessarily be the views held by the company. Thank you.

David Robison

unread,
Feb 5, 2013, 4:16:40 PM2/5/13
to vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com
It is now showing ViconNet Mode. I have all the switches in their default position. If I turn SW8 on (Disable ViconNet) then do I also need to turn on switch SW6 to disable NTCIP? Am I looking at the wrong switchers? David

David Robison

unread,
Feb 5, 2013, 4:28:21 PM2/5/13
to vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com
OK, Now its showing ONVIF Mode but I'l still getting the same error. Any thoughts? David


On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 3:22:37 PM UTC-5, David Robison wrote:

Frank Jacovino

unread,
Feb 6, 2013, 10:43:26 AM2/6/13
to kc7b...@gmail.com, vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com

I think you are going to the wrong port – 80. Should be 8000.

 

Frank

 

From: vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com [mailto:vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of David Robison


Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:28 PM
To: vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vicon Security Help Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vicon-security-hel...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

David Robison

unread,
Feb 6, 2013, 10:48:39 AM2/6/13
to vicon-securi...@googlegroups.com
That's odd. From the ONVIF Core specification:

7.3.2.3 Addresses
A device shall include the <d:XAddrs> element with the address(es) for the device service in 
the Hello message. A URI shall be provided for each protocol (http, https) and externally 
available IP address.
The device should provide a port 80 device service entry in order to allow firewall traversal

It seems to me that according to the spec each devices should provide a port 80 interface to the ONVIF control. Is there a reason Vicon has not?
David

On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 3:22:37 PM UTC-5, David Robison wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages