My blog is also not aproved for almost 2 months.
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Miha Cerar
Jun 30, 2009, 7:12:16 AM6/30/09
to vfxy Photoblogs
Is there any reason why? I will be glad if you could aproved it. Or
how to send you an email? Thank you.
Miha
http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/6936
how to send you an email? Thank you.
Miha
http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/6936
Sean
Aug 5, 2009, 3:45:23 PM8/5/09
to vfxy Photoblogs
I have been waiting for 3! It seems like you just have to wait...
http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/6894
http://photos.vfxy.com/photoblogs/6894
David Di Biase
Aug 5, 2009, 3:51:03 PM8/5/09
to vfxy-ph...@googlegroups.com
Hi Sean,
Unfortunately we constantly have a list of about 100-150 photoblogs in the approval stage given the sheer volume of users. I apologise for the delay, but there really isn't much that can be done but wait. This does not mean we don't appreciate your application, we just need more man power!
Regards,
David
Unfortunately we constantly have a list of about 100-150 photoblogs in the approval stage given the sheer volume of users. I apologise for the delay, but there really isn't much that can be done but wait. This does not mean we don't appreciate your application, we just need more man power!
Regards,
David
Stephen DesRoches
Aug 5, 2009, 4:18:15 PM8/5/09
to vfxy Photoblogs
We could just auto approve everyone waiting ;)
On Aug 5, 4:51 pm, David Di Biase <dave.dibi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Unfortunately we constantly have a list of about 100-150 photoblogs in the
> approval stage given the sheer volume of users. I apologise for the delay,
> but there really isn't much that can be done but wait. This does not mean we
> don't appreciate your application, we just need more man power!
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
On Aug 5, 4:51 pm, David Di Biase <dave.dibi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Unfortunately we constantly have a list of about 100-150 photoblogs in the
> approval stage given the sheer volume of users. I apologise for the delay,
> but there really isn't much that can be done but wait. This does not mean we
> don't appreciate your application, we just need more man power!
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
David Di Biase
Aug 5, 2009, 4:26:56 PM8/5/09
to vfxy-ph...@googlegroups.com
And have 150-200 potentially broken feeds! What would be such a
headache for everyone.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2009-08-05, at 4:18 PM, Stephen DesRoches <desr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
headache for everyone.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2009-08-05, at 4:18 PM, Stephen DesRoches <desr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Stephen DesRoches
Aug 5, 2009, 4:37:02 PM8/5/09
to vfxy Photoblogs
I'm not disagreeing but to argue that. A feed could easily break an
hour after it's approved (and some do) so we're not really preventing
that.
On Aug 5, 5:26 pm, David Di Biase <dave.dibi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And have 150-200 potentially broken feeds! What would be such a
> headache for everyone.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2009-08-05, at 4:18 PM, Stephen DesRoches <desroc...@gmail.com>
hour after it's approved (and some do) so we're not really preventing
that.
On Aug 5, 5:26 pm, David Di Biase <dave.dibi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And have 150-200 potentially broken feeds! What would be such a
> headache for everyone.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
David Di Biase
Aug 5, 2009, 5:11:04 PM8/5/09
to vfxy-ph...@googlegroups.com
That's a rare occassions. The point is to import the current 10
(typically) or do posts then deal with errors as they arise after
approval. It's not perfect obviously and definitely open to discussion.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2009-08-05, at 4:37 PM, Stephen DesRoches <desr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
(typically) or do posts then deal with errors as they arise after
approval. It's not perfect obviously and definitely open to discussion.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2009-08-05, at 4:37 PM, Stephen DesRoches <desr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages