Member Veterans Pension Group
Adviser War Widows Association
1 Surashri,1146 Lakaki Road
Shivajinagar
Pune 411016
raviw...@gmail.com
9822329340
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "veteransindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to veteransindi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CAFTWKgCE7xMkiPOUHpRTX8u1hBW7m%3DPXDhcdydhNs3wEff5Yug%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CACvc9LDnEwFSnOf0LAgOT1AYMCOdZxbgku5nBsu8C5nbc46TTg%40mail.gmail.com.
Member Veterans Pension Group
Adviser War Widows Association
1 Surashri,1146 Lakaki Road
Shivajinagar
Pune 411016
raviw...@gmail.com
9822329340
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CAH%3DCOvb0QGYpYpkJcrQCz8gT%2Bcg2_KGJ%2BsK-nvO4FdfVGw2tSw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CACvc9LDtR0ySaMcU0eKZsZ5wSmZ-XwhJ%2BOpGk9vWSbi8K1q3wQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Dear Cdr Pathak,
Thank you for your candid and strongly worded reply.
I certainly respect your perspective, especially regarding the OROP agitation which, as you point out, was the primary force that led to its eventual, albeit "langdi" (incomplete), implementation. It undeniably proves that focused agitation is sometimes necessary to effect change from a hesitant establishment.
However, I maintain that agitation and contribution are not mutually exclusive; they are two sides of the same coin when seeking recognition and respect.
I see a clear distinction in how we, as veterans, can address the "ground reality" of the establishment's shortcomings:
Confrontation & Demand: This is the path of organized, assertive action, like the OROP agitation, using 'Sam, Dam, Danda, and Bhed' to secure our rights and fight our legal cases. This is crucial for fixing immediate, systemic issues of entitlement.
Contribution & Influence: This is the path of proving our indispensable value to the nation post-service. If 99.9% of veterans are not visibly contributing to nation-building, the establishment and the public find it easier to discount us and our demands.
The Raksha Mantri's statement (cited earlier) correctly identifies us as a "national asset." Our challenge is to ensure our actions in civil life—beyond social media debates—substantiate that claim, thus making it much harder for 'his own ministry' to fight against us in courts.
When we significantly impact local governance, education, disaster management, or entrepreneurial growth—utilizing the very leadership, discipline, and strategic thinking the Minister praised—our collective voice in demanding our due will carry far more weight. Our value will be self-evident.
We must continue to fight for our rights and entitlements with full resolve, but let's simultaneously step up our visible, tangible contribution to the nation's fabric. This dual approach will give us both the moral high ground and the unassailable public support we deserve.
Lastly, your comment: "So please keep these goody goody views with you" seems extremely jarring. You can be extremely candid and strong in your criticism/comments against an idea, but to suggest "keep these goody goody views with you" is not only inappropriate and fundamentally wrong but displays a lack of respect for someone else's view, almost demanding that the other person shut up or words to that effect. Is it the lack of training and education in the military or lack of ability to be extremely critical without being offensive, but worse still, taking away the right of the colleague to his fundamental right to freedom of expression.
Marketplace of Ideas: Ideas must clash with ideas for truth to emerge!
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."
In "On Liberty" (1859) John Stuart Mill argued that "...there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered." Mill argues that the fullest liberty of expression is required to push arguments to their logical limits, rather than the limits of social embarrassment. However, Mill also introduced what is known as the harm principle, in placing the following limitation on free expression:
"the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
But let us step beyond satire. As Mill reminded us in On Liberty:
“The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is that it is robbing the human race. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth. If it is wrong, they lose what is almost as great a benefit—the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth produced by its collision with error.”
To censor is not merely to harm the one with an opinion; it is to degrade the entire group (our group), stripping it of the opportunity to test its ideas through honest friction. As Mill further wrote:
“If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.”
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CACvc9LDtR0ySaMcU0eKZsZ5wSmZ-XwhJ%2BOpGk9vWSbi8K1q3wQ%40mail.gmail.com.
With due respect, the above argument reflects a very superficial understanding of the ground reality and the sacrifices of veterans. To say that “98% of us do nothing towards nation building” is not only dismissive but also deeply unfair.
Contribution Beyond Uniform: Veterans continue to make significant contributions in multiple spheres, including administration, industry, education, agriculture, the corporate sector, disaster management, entrepreneurship, and social service. Their discipline, integrity, and leadership have shaped numerous institutions across the country. Many NGOs, schools, start-ups, and welfare initiatives are run by ex-servicemen who impact society in ways often unnoticed by the mainstream.
Nation-Building is not Only About Numbers: The value of veterans cannot be measured by their vote bank percentage. Veterans represent a moral constituency built upon sacrifice and service to the nation. Their issues are not just “demands” but rightful entitlements promised by the State for services rendered in the prime of life.
OROP Did Not Come as a Gift: To say OROP was given solely by one Prime Minister is misleading. It was achieved through decades of persistent struggle, representation, agitation, and judicial battles by veterans. The hunger strike of Col (Retd) Pushpender Singh and others, along with protests at Jantar Mantar, and constant follow-up by veteran organisations, created national and political pressure that ultimately compelled implementation. It was not charity—it was a rightful correction of injustice.
Critical Voice is not “Abuse”: When veterans raise their voices against mismanagement, corruption, or apathy in institutions, it is not “abuse” but an act of accountability in a democracy. Constructive criticism is an essential part of nation-building. Blind admiration of establishments without questioning their failures would only breed inefficiency and injustice.
Relevance of Veterans: Veterans remain relevant not by social media “heroics” but because they represent values of courage, sacrifice, and integrity. They speak for those who cannot—especially the widows, disabled soldiers, and families of martyrs. If their voices are silenced in the name of “looking inward,” it will only embolden those who neglect their welfare.
In conclusion, nation-building is not about remaining silent or accepting whatever is handed down but about constantly striving for justice, accountability, and equitable treatment. Veterans have already proven their worth in uniform; their continuing fight for dignity and rights is itself a service to the nation, ensuring future generations of soldiers are treated fairly.
Regards,
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CAAoj_dXZm--dwHRzf9mzc_3oWWXtgern2_reC5FxJrf2vEX4%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CAAoj_dXZm--dwHRzf9mzc_3oWWXtgern2_reC5FxJrf2vEX4%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Armed Forces Veterans" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to armedforcesvete...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/armedforcesveterans/CAFTWKgA9kTmKQZdXDcsbBUxFWJ3dFqQA2iNrk40KEXUzVc6mMg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
You seem to be contradicting your own observations about the RM’s speech. Ideally, our stance should align with what the RM and you have stated, but in reality, it appears quite the opposite. I know enough veterans to fairly assess their contributions. Can you name five veterans whose achievements stand out at the national or international level?
In just one month at JM, we created a perception of influence that had eluded us for nearly fifty years — almost like a scene out of Mungeri Lal. But what have we really achieved in the eleven years since OROP? Are we to believe that in seventy-eight years of independence, we suddenly reached our peak in that single month?
For clarity, I am not referring to Col Pushpinder’s hunger strike. Thirty years before him, in 1984, Col Inderjeet Singh went on hunger strike demanding OROP. OROP was his idea, his brainchild, his relentless struggle. Yet, no one paid attention then. JM or no JM, another thirty years might have gone by with little concern.
In my view, we veterans have largely been non-performers and have often patted ourselves on the back for the wrong reasons.
Member Veterans Pension Group
Adviser War Widows Association
1 Surashri,1146 Lakaki Road
Shivajinagar
Pune 411016
raviw...@gmail.com
9822329340
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CAFTWKgCJbONLrWXJAz_KcWATXWTzY_kR46n4MPtiWcnV%3D7GoZw%40mail.gmail.com.
I was at JM almost every day and closely observed the proceedings. My course, with my active participation, organized the candle march to India Gate. We also contributed—both financially and physically—towards the OROP movement.
Col Inderjeet Sir, despite being in a wheelchair, came and inspired us all. I spoke with him several times and found him to be a truly selfless leader. Yet, even his sincere efforts could not move the governments in power. The reality is—had Prime Minister Modi not been willing, no one else on earth could have secured OROP.
Everything went well until the OROP announcement. At that point, 26 ESM organizations stood united. Maj Gen Satbir delivered some motivational talks—high on enthusiasm, but low on substance. What I found disappointing was his tendency to sideline others. A small group of his followers made much noise at his arrival, while ignoring senior veterans like Gen Yadav and others, who were far more balanced and thoughtful. Gen Yadav, who led the largest ESM organization, deserved recognition but was completely overlooked.
Maj Gen Satbir gradually became a self-proclaimed leader of the agitation. While 25 organizations accepted the OROP announcement and withdrew, he coined the term “Langadi OROP” and continued the protest, leading us into the difficult situation we face today—where hardly anyone cares about our cause. He aligned himself with the opposition, projecting himself as a great leader, but in reality became a convenient “use-and-throw” figure.
Where does he stand today? Nowhere. Eleven years have passed since he promised an “Asli OROP”, and he has not even managed to get the returned medals restored.
Meanwhile, ESMs and widows with genuine grievances continue to suffer because of this immature approach. He continues to enjoy the benefits of Langdi OROP without any remorse.
What we need today is a mature, credible leader—someone with clear vision and practical strategy to engage the establishment effectively. As of now, we remain stuck in the middle of nowhere.