Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit has been acquitted by an NIA court in the Malegaon blast case
SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA
SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA
Ravindra Waman Pathak
Do I have enemies? Yes.Good. That means I’ve stood up for something, sometime in my life.
Member Veterans Pension Group
Adviser War Widows Association
1 Surashri,1146 Lakaki Road
Shivajinagar
Pune 411016
raviw...@gmail.com
9822329340
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "veteransindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to veteransindi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/9d92bd19-dcc8-4515-bf43-a1e1b6c3f1e5n%40googlegroups.com.
SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA
You’ve raised a very valid and nuanced point — and it exposes the uncomfortable intersection of justice, institutional accountability, and the fate of individual military careers. Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit’s ordeal is a stark reminder of how a decorated, high-performing officer can be dragged through years of incarceration and vilification based on allegations that ultimately collapsed in court for want of evidence. His eventual promotion is a welcome but belated step that restores only his rank, not the years of lost honour, missed command opportunities, and emotional trauma inflicted on him and his family. The Army and government must go beyond routine reinstatement — a special commendation or recognition is warranted, not merely to compensate one officer, but to send a clear institutional message that mere suspicion can never be allowed to destroy reputations and careers. Justice delayed must not become justice denied.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CACvc9LB5MU78hDjraUfkVeTCNB5aeboZ4tZYavMXUB6Uav%2BXag%40mail.gmail.com.
Helping Hands For Veterans
The recent promotion of Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit to the rank of Colonel marks the culmination of a long and arduous journey — not just through the corridors of the Indian Army, but through the complex and often unforgiving corridors of justice. Acquitted on July 31 by a special NIA court in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, Col Purohit’s story is a stark reminder of the precarious balance between institutional accountability, justice, and the fate of individual military careers.
Col Purohit, a decorated officer with an impeccable record, was among seven accused in the tragic 2008 Malegaon blast that claimed six lives and injured over a hundred. His arrest and subsequent incarceration sent shockwaves through the armed forces and the nation alike, not merely because of the gravity of the allegations, but because it involved a serving officer — an unprecedented situation in India’s military history. For years, he endured legal battles, media scrutiny, and the uncertainty of suspended service, all while maintaining faith in the system that had been quick to cast suspicion upon him.
The NIA court’s verdict, emphasising that “mere suspicion cannot replace proof,” acquitted him and his co-accused due to the absence of reliable and cogent evidence. The judgment was a reaffirmation of the fundamental legal principle that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and suspicion alone is never sufficient to ruin lives. For Col Purohit, this acquittal was not only a vindication but a necessary step towards the restoration of his professional dignity.
Yet, while his promotion to Colonel restores his official rank, it cannot undo the personal and professional costs: the lost years, the missed command opportunities, and the emotional toll borne by him and his family. The ordeal underlines a deeper institutional challenge — how to safeguard the careers and reputations of serving officers when investigations, no matter how well-intentioned, falter or drag on for years.
Col Purohit’s case is not merely an individual victory; it is a precedent. It demonstrates the urgent need for systemic safeguards to ensure that officers are not left to suffer prolonged professional limbo based on unproven allegations. Beyond reinstatement, there is a compelling argument for formal recognition or a special commendation — not only to honour Col Purohit’s resilience but also to send a clear institutional message: mere suspicion must never be allowed to destroy honour, reputation, or a career.
As India reflects on this chapter, it is a moment to affirm that justice delayed should never become justice denied, and that institutions, including the Army, must uphold both accountability and fairness with equal rigor. Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit’s journey from suspicion to vindication is a lesson in patience, courage, and the enduring power of truth.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CAFTWKgANW%3DY_2CYj-OYei-uTKzJK2LXEAaxZ7jrtAV69Mb%3DKgw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
HELPING HANDS FOR VETERANS
We proudly support our Armed Forces veterans. If you're a veteran in need, we're here to help.
GOOGLE GROUP:
https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/helping-hands-for-veterans
E-mail ID: veteranshe...@gmail.com
X (Previously tweeter) : @ helpinghandsFVLet’s work together to create a strong, respectful, and helpful community for our veterans!
Support our heroes. 
Make a Contribution to the Army Battle Casualties Welfare Fund and stand with the bravehearts who safeguard our nation. 
Every rupee counts. 