The government has released a new CGHS rate list, adopted by ECHS on 5 Dec 2025. (echs.gov.in https://www.echs.gov.in/assets/policy/CGHS%20rates%20list%20adoption%20Final%20policy%20letter%2005%20Dec%2025%20with%20covering%20letter.pdf )
Under the new policy, ~2,000 medical procedures/tests now have updated package rates — the first comprehensive overhaul since 2014. (mint)
The new rate structure is more differentiated than before: rates now depend on
the type of hospital (e.g. “super-specialty hospitals”) (mint),
whether the hospital is accredited by National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare Providers (NABH) or not (Express Healthcare),
the city-classification (Tier I / II / III) where the hospital is located (mint), and
the beneficiary’s ward entitlement (semiprivate / general / private) (Central Govt Employees News).
For general-ward entitlement, the payable rate is 5% less than the semiprivate-ward package; for private-ward entitlement — 5% more. (Central Govt Employees News)
| Scheme / Beneficiaries | Effective date of new rates |
|---|---|
| CGHS (central government employees/pensioners) | 13 October 2025 (mint) |
| ECHS beneficiaries (ex-servicemen, dependents) | 15 December 2025 (Central Govt Employees News) |
The new rates apply to all healthcare services at ECHS-empanelled hospitals, including cashless treatment and medical reimbursement claims. (Central Govt Employees News)
The previously existing memoranda on package rates have been superseded. (Central Govt Employees News)
This is the most comprehensive CGHS update in 15 years. (mint)
The revision is intended to:
Bring rate equivalence closer to actual costs — many private hospitals had cited outdated CGHS rates as a reason for refusing cashless treatment. (The Economic Times)
Introduce fairer pricing: accreditation, hospital type, city cost-of-living, and ward entitlement are reflected in rates to avoid uniform “one-size” pricing that was unfair to some cases. (mint)
Improve access and quality of care for beneficiaries under both CGHS and ECHS. (Express Healthcare)
If you’re hospitalised under CGHS or ECHS after the effective dates, final billing will follow the new package rates.
Coverage (cashless or reimbursement) continues as before — but the amount admissible will vary depending on hospital-tier, accreditation, city classification and ward entitlement.
For general-ward admissions: expect a slight reduction (-5%) compared to semiprivate-ward package; for private-ward, a +5% increase.
Non-medical or “inadmissible” items (e.g. toiletries, attendant food, non-medical services) are not to be billed to CGHS — hospitals must issue separate bills for those. (Legality Simplified)
HELPING HANDS FOR VETERANS
We proudly support our Armed Forces veterans. If you're a veteran in need, we're here to help.
GOOGLE GROUP:
https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/helping-hands-for-veterans
E-mail ID: veteranshe...@gmail.com
X (Previously tweeter) : @ helpinghandsFVLet’s work together to create a strong, respectful, and helpful community for our veterans!
Support our heroes.
Make a Contribution to the Army Battle Casualties Welfare Fund and stand with the bravehearts who safeguard our nation.
Every rupee counts.
Member Veterans Pension Group
Adviser War Widows Association
1 Surashri,1146 Lakaki Road
Shivajinagar
Pune 411016
raviw...@gmail.com
9822329340
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "veteransindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to veteransindi...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/veteransindia/CAGtFL%3DP0mQW091qegxW%3DJH2u18OgXZ%3Df_ksy7A3B%2Brn%2B0q0hmg%40mail.gmail.com.
Delayed reimbursements, outdated and unrealistic package rates, and arbitrary, unexplained deductions have rendered participation in ECHS, CGHS, and similar government health schemes increasingly unviable for many hospitals. Healthcare providers are compelled to deliver services at rates that bear little relation to actual costs, while enduring prolonged and uncertain payment cycles that severely strain cash flows and operational sustainability. Recurrent claim rejections and unilateral deductions, frequently imposed without reasoned orders, transparency, or any meaningful grievance redressal mechanism, further erode confidence in these schemes.
It is also pertinent to mention that officials entrusted with the statutory and fiduciary responsibility of safeguarding the interests of beneficiaries have demonstrably failed to discharge their duties honestly, fairly, and in accordance with established rules and procedures. Such administrative apathy and dereliction have directly contributed to the withdrawal or curtailment of services by reputed hospitals, thereby denying beneficiaries timely and adequate medical care and fundamentally defeating the stated objectives of these welfare programmes.