Paper Gundam Template
Karmen Mcarthun
This papercraft template was submitted by our friend Celvin Dian Pratama. He lets Paper Replika to publish and host the his papercraft template. He made a papercraft template of Gundam -type GAT-X207 Blitz. The pattern contains the head and torso parts. This template is a blank/white template, which must be printed on colored paper. Each piece of the same color is grouped in the same page. This papercraft height when assembled is about 19 cm, from the horns to the bottom of the skirt armor. The template is in PDF file and assembly instructions in PDO files, which can be opened with Pepakura Viewer. After this 8 pages template, Celvin will update with the rest of the part, part by part.
This is the last of 5 parts, with this weapon kit the Gundam is complete. The weapons are not as complicated as they are seen. I have simplify many parts for easier and stress-free build. All parts are designed to be static display model as seen on the presentation image below. If you want the Impulse to hold a sword, you have to modify it yourself. The template contains 13 pages of patterns for build a rifle, a shield, two swords, a boomerang and a booster backpack. Next big poject is continuing Jaeger Striker Eureka model, also Cristiano and Suraj will still continue their Iron man Gemini and Gypsy Danger Jaeger model.
This template contains of 6 pages of patterns for both Sword Impulse Gundam arms. The page begins with the left parts. The right patterns parts use same numbers as the left one, they are only mirrored parts. Many have asked me what happen with the other mecha project, the jaegers. I decided to finish this Sword Impulse first before I continue with other mecha. After this arm parts, it will continue with the last one, jet pack / back pack with wings, swords, shield and weapon. All at once. They all should be faster to prepare, because there are no more moveable parts.
When I work on Jaeger model I thought there is still one model which doesn't have its next part for so long, some people also expressed their needs for the next part on PR Facebook page. So I decided to finish the next part of Sword Impulse Gundam first before making new "big" project. I model this leg part quite fast, because I simplified its shape in some parts, coloring and instructions took more time. Also I have to stop the process because I have to do a simple commissioned paper craft design first. The template consist of 19 pages of patterns. The assembly instructions mainly cover the left leg part.
Finally had time to complete Sword Impulse Gundam torso part. The template consist of 3 pages of patterns. Most of the parts are modular, only a few that are not closed geometry. I made this template as easy as possible to assembly, but still there are some parts that I can not make it easier. Just make sure you have a sharp cutter blade, and make all the patterns well-scored you will be okay. I left the shaft without axle for arm joints, because I still have to figure out new joint design for the arm parts later. This release is only torso, you can obtain head parts on previous release.
Ideas? Anyone read the thing and know the major characters, such that would have independent significance outside the work? There may not be any. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Other than Martin the Warrior, Matthias, and possibly Cregga Rose-eyes I believe the rest of the characters would be best dealt with by merging into lists. Cluny only appears in one book. Also, as far as reading the thing goes, I think I've read every book up until the second latest one at least twice and personally own nearly all of them. --tjstrf 21:02, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Guys, I totally agree with anon btw. The material over there in GFDL. We can just incorporate them by reference and link them throughout. They can hold the cruft over there, and we can keep just the books, the main characters, and a list of characters without particulars but with links to the RW wiki. I've seen that done with Gundam stuff and 9/11 obituaries. As long as the license is free, the KNOWLEDGE is PRESERVED for GENERATIONS TO COME and for JIMBO'S CHILD IN AFRICA (perish the thought of him reading about fake squirrels, but...) - - - to quote the condom-promoting horse, my job is done here! - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In response to the anon, I believe the point is to centralize things. The purpose of having Redwall articles here rather is that it be all sorted and encyclopedic. Otherwise we might as well just have a stub that says "Redwall is the titular novel of an 18(?) book series by author Brian Jacques. If you want to read about it in any more detail than this, go to Wikia, these 43 fansites, and your local library" --tjstrf 22:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. Also, I note that yours is a comparatively new project. You may be interested in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide, which has a lot of information regarding project organization from several of the most successful WikiProjects. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 19:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 17:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey all, it looks like there hasn't been any real activity in here for a while, but hopefully this will still be seen. I've been doing some behind the scenes work of late; I made articles for Fortunata, Shang Damsontongue, Dingeye, Thura, Bloodwrath, Midge Manycoats, and started a proper one for Verdauga Greeneyes.
I also spent all night making all the articles listed under the "Redwall characters" category consistent; bold name with a one line intro including the book they appeared in, as well as any and all actors that voiced them in the audiobooks or animated series. Then a few paragraphs for the body, linking wherever I could to other Redwall articles. Then I made sure to include the Redwall template at the bottom of each.
Hope this is okay with everyone. I've also been making a lot of changes to the List of species in Redwall article. Anyway, I'd love some feedback on my talk page or any of the talk pages of articles that I've made or been changing. Thanks! GlassCobra 12:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We probably need a better 'to-do' list. I've already added the Redwall template to all the articles currently in the list, so that's done. What else can we do? Ideas anyone?--Song 17:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, well I've been looking at some of our participants' contribution records, and some people on the list haven't been on here on months, or even years. Thus, to reduce membership to people who are actually around, I'll be conducting a roll call of all members. I'll be moving all members to a Potentially Active list, and then leaving messages on everyone's talk pages to come and add their names back to the Active list. If there's no response within a few days, your name will be moved to the Inactive list, but it can be moved back to the Active list at any time. Please don't be offended if you just joined, this is only to figure out who's active and who's not, okay? Thanks everyone! GlassCobra 18:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I suppose here is as good a place as any to have this debate. Basically, it seems to me that transwiking is, well, a rather stupid idea. Seeing as Wikipedia is not paper, I can't think of any reason that content doesn't belong here as well as on a more focused wiki. I completely agree with the quote from Jimbo that says "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free accessto the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing." Now, obviously there are some limits; Wikipedia will never be a place for things made up in school one day or for every band that some random 8th graders make up, but I see no reason why we should not have comprehensive, detailed coverage about the characters and books of this fantastic series. Thoughts? I'd like to hear some deletionist-leaning perspectives especially. I'd also really like for people to add this page to their watchlists, if they haven't already; I want as many voices as we can get in this debate. Thanks. GlassCobra 08:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
93ddb68554