Piper Warrior Vs Archer

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Gladys Anick

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 2:55:53 AM8/5/24
to vermechanching
Amazedthat I fell for the looks, amazed that I bought this Archer after the reviews on your Warrior II. I had hoped that since there were no bad remarks or reviews on your archer that I could take a chance. Wow was I wrong!

The ground handling is very sensitive. The flare and landing handling is terrible. Hello chiropractor. Landings are probably a bug in X plane itself, not this Archer. See link in additional post below.


" There are no major performance changes from that of older Archers and Cherokee 180s. On a warm South Florida morning, we wrung out the Archer III to a maximum of 140 knots true at full throttle (2,700 rpm) and 5,500 feet. Backed off to a more realistic 2,450 rpm, the Archer III managed about 120 knots true. The manual says that the Archer can achieve 128 knots at 75-percent power at 8,000 feet."


If you are going to leave your aircraft up for sale, I suggest you convert them to trial ware. (Sort of like what X plane does with their demo version.) I would like my money back, or this thing fixed. It is a lemon.


I'm getting used to the ground handling (although imo still too sensitive, it is doable) and the landing is feeling better once I concentrate a bit harder. It does float in ground effect like a warrior/archer should at least. Anyway, since no refunds, I'll either use it, or not....


Also on the flaring, AFTER landing the Archer, or the Cessna 172, I can hold stick back to bleed off air speed and drag tail of plane on ground down to about 20 knots, that ain't realistic and is a flaw in the game. Flaring and settling to runway in X plane, either 10 or 11 is not realistic, however with Archer I did practice more and I got it closer. A no flap landing feels more "real". You should be able to gradually pull the stick back and use the wing for aero braking, which can be done in x-plane, but it can easily be over done and go unrealistic at slow speeds where tail should have no possibility to hit ground, yet it does.


I have to admit this plane is essentially unflyable, and a waste of money. I fly a Warrior II in real life, and mercifully it flies nothing like this. So twitchy, this sim version of the Piper is impossible to fly.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages