Urban Woods & Vatika Infotech City, Jaipur

163 views
Skip to first unread message

Oscar D'Souza

unread,
Apr 15, 2009, 9:56:10 AM4/15/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,
 
I have taken possession of my unit on Delonix street couple of days back. Pls note my first hand experience during my visit to the site.
 
Access to Development: Till date there is no proper access to the Development. The access road passes through a village which has large pot-holes with water filled in them from the drainage of the inhabitants. Pigs and dogs roam in the close vicinity. It is a pity that Vatika has decided to hand over Urban Woods even without arranging proper access to the community.
 
Electrical Fittings: No electrical fittings like lights, fans etc have been provided. This is as per the agreement which I guess most of us have overlooked. Wardrobes too haven't been provided. We have to invest additional sums to make these units liveable.
 
Registration Process: Vatika is charging around 15,000/- Rs as adminstrative fees for registration whereas the same process could be done by any lawyer for around 1500-3000 Rs. They are stooping low and even making money from us in the registration process. Considering that there are doing bulk registration they would be getting very attractive rates from lawyers. They are not only pocketing the difference but are also inflating the charges many times.
 
Development at Site: All work has practically stopped at Vatika Infotech City. All the developments are on hold at the moment, I did not notice any activity at all in the Commercial or other residential developments there. Vatika has recovered almost 95% for Urban Woods, Plot units & other projects and has siphoned off this money to develop other projects in India & eventually neglecting this project.
 
Renting/Sale of Units: It would be very difficult to rent or sell units in this project. I guess the waiting period for activity in the secondary market would be around 5-7 years. Vatika has made things worse by applying total brakes on the development because of the global slowdown.
 
6 Retail Outlet: The convenience store is very small and scantily equipped, all the requirements would need to be bought from Jaipur city.
 
7 Club House:  The clubhouse is not yet ready but Vatika has still gone ahead in handing over the units. They have recovered the full amount for the club house and it is their job to finish the job before handover. Roads on Delonix street are still not ready but handover has proceeded.
 
Considering all the above I feel Vatika has been taking all NRI investors for granted and not doing anything substantial to develop the project as per their earlier plan.
 
I am sure any one who visits the site will have a similar opinion.
 
 
Awaiting your feedback.
 
Regards,
 
Oscar
 

ARUN BHANDARI

unread,
Apr 15, 2009, 10:03:42 AM4/15/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear Oscar,
Its disappointing to note your first hand experience.
Mr.Kapoor, any comments?
Thanks
ARUN

 

Sanjeev Kapur

unread,
Apr 15, 2009, 12:14:00 PM4/15/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear Mr Bhandari,
I too have taken possession of a unit in Urban Woods on Delonix street .
 
My comments to the points raised by oscar d'souza are given hereunder ;
 
1. Access to the development : The main gate of the township opens on ajmer road at the point where the toll plaza is right now. The entry road from Ajmer road is 130 feet wide. The state govt has asked the National Highway authority for shifting of the the toll plaza and then Vatika would be allowed open the Main access road. It should happen very shortly after elections.
 
2. Electric Fittings are never provided by any builder. Neither were they promised. Same is the case with wardrobes.
 
3. Thats Mr Oscar D'souza perception which is totally wrong. I am a resident of Jaipur and deal with lawyers every other day for registeration and for my own unit also i had verified the rates from the courts. The rates charged by Vatika are actuals as paid by them and are reasonable.
 
4. Development at Site: The speed of construction has slowed down but not stopped as reported by this gentleman. 95% of UW , plot units and commercial is sold as per this gentleman. This again is not a fact. They have siphoned off money to develop other projects is another one of his imaginations and as in the past he gets carried over and exagerates. Its his frustration at not being able to sell his unit. He uses such venomous language for Vatika only to vent out his frustartion.
 
 5. Renting/Sale of Units :Renting is on and i too have rented my unit just yesterday. As regards Re-sale there has been a standstill since last 5/6 months but again one has to be optimistic. I personally feel feel that it should pick up within next 12 months from today. Again that my personal feeling and i could be proved wrong by the market.
 
6. Retail Outlet is small currently coz of a small demand from just 7/8 families living there. But the positive side is that Vatika has made a conscious effort to offer this retail outlet free of rent to this shopkeeper to provide provisions and day to day necessities to UW residents.
 
7. Club House is not yet ready.
 
On the whole Vatika Infotech City is poised to become sought after destination once fully developed. IT may take 2/3 yrs to fully develop but the facilities and ammenities that it will offer will make it the best place to live in Jaipur. This I say as a resident of Jaipur.
 
Rgds.
 
Sanjeev Kapur

Gagan Lalwani

unread,
Apr 15, 2009, 1:36:29 PM4/15/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
I agree with Sanjeev and Oscar both partially!  As far as Oscar is concerned he is right, the place is not liveable in current condition (my own visit observation), especially for entrance (he is absolutely correct in his description) and day to day facilities.  Therefore, it is bit of hurry on the part of Vatika to hand over.  If they had told us that the facilities (basic) will follow the handover I think our decision would be different.
 
Sanjeev is true!  the investment is our decision.  If we can non sale it or rent it is our luck.  No one predicted the situation at that time.  However, Vatika on their part is also not been fair when it comes to just getting rid of these apartments.  Nowhere in the world you move people 20 km away from the town without basic facilities like medical, grocerries, bank, schools etc.  Mind it these are part of the whole project so any construction should be along with these basic amenities.
 
So guys!  it's a call we have to take if we can go and live.  If yes, take possession and be happy and if not then talk to developer, which none of us has done so far. 

Sreemant Roy

unread,
Apr 18, 2009, 6:02:19 AM4/18/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
I too have an unit in UW, in the Ceiba (acacia) street, which i understood from one of Sanjeev's mails would be ready by mid year.
 
I became a member of this forum some time back and have been reading the mails from various members and with a lot of interest mails from Oscar and Sanjeev.
 
In general Oscars mails are always negative....and Sanjeev's mails are always positive.
 
The point which i want to make...and which is a fact at this moment of time...is that we are all in shit...as far as this project is concerned...and we would have to carry on with it for a few more years.
 
So insted of crying in shit....and making the environment more shittier........lets relax...laugh about it a little...in any case.....jaipur is a nice place...you never know....what is there in store for us.....
 
Just to give you an idea about my self....we are from calcutta....at the moment i am based in Abu Dhabi.....we have nothing remotely connected in Jaipur.....in 2006 my son was born...we had some spare money...thought this would be an excellent investment opportunity for my son in the long run....we even went to jaipur to see the development...went to the site through the same dirty road...in 2006 and ......had been there in 2008 Nov as well....went through the same dirty road......once again....so what..
 
One day ....it would be fine....as Sanjeev is always talking positive...lets ask his openion as to how we could make the living experience in UW better....lets think positive.
 
Of course want to thank Oscar for taking the intiative and sharing with us his side of the story.
 
Rgds,
 
Sreemant Roy.
00971 50 6578723
 
By the way....my unit 21, GF, Acacia / Ceiba Street...i would like to know who are my neighbours....
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
2009/4/15 Gagan Lalwani <gagan....@gmail.com>

Shaleen Chugh

unread,
Apr 18, 2009, 6:16:58 AM4/18/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com, Sanjeev Kapur, sanjeev kapur, Vatika Group, jaidee...@yahoo.co.in
Dear All,

I have 2 units in the same project.

I agree we will have to face the turmoil more bravely and be more patient but that does not mean Vatika should take us for a reide.

While I agree that the many things and down turn in world economies resulting in lower prcies of UW or lower demand is not in the hands of Vatika but Sanjeev must help all by putting our point accross to Vatika (Mr. Bhalla) that they must act fast.

I mean they must sort out the issues addressed by various members like enterance, construction of parking, club house and other amenities as promised. And then they should insist for possession. Till such time all is complete and the place is livable in all rspect we should not take possession.

Regards

Shaleen Chugh
Head of Corporate Banking
Qatar National Bank-Oman
P O Box 4050, PC112
Sultanate of Oman
Mobile :    00968 95328173
               00968 99468967
Direct line 00968 24725540
Fax          00968 24779233
shalee...@qnb.com.qa



PS..........Sanjeev please take up the matter with Vatika and inform them our request of completing the project in all respect before handing over the possession.
--



Gagan Lalwani

unread,
Apr 18, 2009, 3:48:13 PM4/18/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
I am with Saleem....

Oscar D'Souza

unread,
Apr 19, 2009, 4:14:22 AM4/19/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sreemant,
 
I appreciate your comments, I may sound negative but this is because of my first hand experience there. I guess you too should visit the site and then form your opinion. The views which I have formed were shared by other plot owners in Vatika Infotech City who are based in India, they have a better understanding of things. I will respond to Mr. Sanjeev's mail in detail as I was back from India only yesterday.
 
The reason I have brought all these issues was to mobilise a common front to ensure that Vatika does not neglect the development at the project. If all of us have a lax attitude Vatika will take their own sweet time to develop the project citing economic reasons. I fully agree with Shaleen's view on the issue of possession but I still decided to take possession as I wanted to finish all the formalities when I was in India.
 
I strongly support the feeback given by Gagan. I recommend that all of you should visit the site, visit other developments in Jaipur and discuss with neutral real estate agents in Jaipur to form a proper opinion.
 
Regards,
 
Oscar
 
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Sreemant Roy <sree...@gmail.com> wrote:

ARUN BHANDARI

unread,
Apr 19, 2009, 2:52:21 PM4/19/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Hello Everyone,
May I suggest that instead of having emotional exchange of opinions, we should list down the points where Vatika has not delivered as per the promises made. Let these be just hard facts and nothing else.
This way we will be able to speak in one voice.
Facts such as
At the time of Delivery of our properties what was the understanding on-
1)Access to Project - Was it the understanding / Promise that access will be from Proper enterence instead of Thikaria Villege. What is mentioned in the project brochure.
2) Club House - Will it be ready?
The ones who have already taken possession, would be able to list down points where what is delivered is not as per the promise made , agreed by Vatika.
This will help us put together key points.
I am sure Mr.Sanjeev could be of great help in preperation of this list in addition to every one who has taken the possession.
Thanking you,
ARUN BHANDARI.

Shaleen Chugh

unread,
Apr 20, 2009, 9:03:55 AM4/20/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com, Sanjeev Kapur, sanjeev kapur, Jaideep Jacob Dennis, Vatika Group, kapil...@vatikagroup.com
Dear All,

Hi,


Hope you noticed my previous mails.....I copied all the mails to Vatika as well as to Sanjeev with a request to take up the matter with Mr. Bhalla, who is the M. Dir or the person who looks after the company.

I have already written that we must not take the possession unless the place is worth living and is complete in all respect. Lower prices or other issues relating to world wide financial turmoil is beyond the company's scope. But they must complete the place in all respect before handing over the possessions.

Thanks and Retards
 

--
Shaleen Chugh
Head of Corporate Banking
Qatar National Bank-Oman
P O Box 4050, PC112
Sultanate of Oman
Mobile :    00968 95328173
               00968 99468967
Direct line 00968 24725540
Fax          00968 24779233
shalee...@qnb.com.qa



Anil Verma

unread,
Apr 20, 2009, 11:55:11 PM4/20/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com

Dear Shaleen

 

Your suggestion is good , however I feel that  if we do not take possession after a notification from vatika then we are even liable to pay them for delay in taking the possession as per the Buyer seller agreement .  I have recently taken the possession of my apartment and I agree that place is still not worth living and we must raise this to Mr. Anil Bhalla / Gaurav Bhalla .

 

Best Regards

 

Anil Verma

Director - Logistics & Supply Chain

Mobile +971502740490

Dir +971 4 423 4430

Fax +971 4 429 8448

P.O.Box 6767, Dubai, UAE

anil....@aswaaq.ae

www.aswaaq.ae

PJSC under formation

logo

 

 

This message is intended for the recipient named above.  It may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Do not read, copy, use or circulate this communication.

 

 recycle-icone Think before you print. Please help your city save paper – only print this message if necessary. If you must print – recycle

Shaleen Chugh

unread,
Apr 21, 2009, 12:36:04 AM4/21/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,

Anil is right but at the same time they have delayed the possession for all of us so they have to agree to us if we all go together. Further as per the cunsumer courts the loan agreement and property deal agreements are skewed towards builders/banks so if we present the case, oif need arises, the decision will definitely be in our favour.

Cheers

Shaleen

Gagan Lalwani

unread,
Apr 21, 2009, 1:27:22 AM4/21/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Guys

You sound like scary bunch... Any agreement is two sided... You are liable if you fault, however, here it's a different case; you are simply asking for a right product before taking delivery, therefore, I won't hesitate to not to take delivery untill I am satisfied with the product.  

SANDEEP SHETTY

unread,
Apr 21, 2009, 1:36:49 AM4/21/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Hi Guys,
 
I fully agree on Shaleen...let us send an official complaint letter signed by all of us in a single page...Now that it is possible, since we are all of the same opinion.
 
We need to speed up the process at the earliest...since they are handing over the possession...
 
Reg'ds,
Sandeep Shetty

Shaleen Chugh

unread,
Apr 21, 2009, 2:14:45 AM4/21/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear All,

I have already marked all the copies to Vatika and requested Sanjeev also to take up the matter with Vatika. I agree lets file an official letter jointly to Vatika and if need be to conumer Court just to say that we all are willing to take possession but only after all the issues as promised by Vatika are complete.

Shaleen

abisgr8

unread,
Apr 21, 2009, 1:27:37 PM4/21/09
to Vatika-Jaipur
Hi All,

I visited the site in Dec 08 and I do agree that it would be difficult
for a person with a family to live in the place. That said, however, I
guess it seems like most of you are forgetting something, We did sign
a contract which is legally binding. Did everyone read it completely
before signing it - I am not sure - I did look at it though. At least
in my contract, there is no mention of either the club house being
ready or the locality to be livable for us to take possession. It just
mentions that the individual unit to be ready, and this is pretty
standard.

Now think about it from Vaatika's point of view. Most of us , I
believe are under the HDFC scheme where Vaatika is paying the pre-EMI.
Basically Vaatika has already got there money from HDFC, and as soon
as your unit is ready for possession, Vaatika has no obligation to pay
the pre-EMI. It is then that our installments kick-in. Now we owe
money to HDFC not Vaatika, and if we default, we can be foreclosed by
HDFC.

Frankly, sitting in the US, I don't think I personally will have time
to run to consumer courts in India etc., and if you think anything can
be done by writing letters / emails then you have been out of India
too long. If you all can get something done - All the power to you. I
think most of us, are educated and professional enough to realize what
is in the contracts we are signing, now are we mature enough to take
responsibility for it ? It is not the verbal promises, or the
brochures which are used as marketing tools that we have to go on, but
the actual document we sign.

Lastly, my friend had bought property in DLF Gurgaon when it was being
developed (late 90's). The swimming pool, Gym, and the club house,
which were a part of the building complex itself was completed about 3
years after possession (Check out Richmond Park DLF Phase IV). So it
is not unusual for this kind of thing to happen. Of course, as per my
previous posts, in this economy, it will take much longer for Vaatika
City to develop than it was for Gurgaon.

Regards
Amit Bhagat

On Apr 21, 1:14 am, Shaleen Chugh <shaleenga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have already marked all the copies to Vatika and requested Sanjeev also to
> take up the matter with Vatika. I agree lets file an official letter jointly
> to Vatika and if need be to conumer Court just to say that we all are
> willing to take possession but only after all the issues as promised by
> Vatika are complete.
>
> Shaleen
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:36 AM, SANDEEP SHETTY <sandyk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
>
> > I fully agree on Shaleen...let us send an official complaint letter signed
> > by all of us in a single page...Now that it is possible, since we are all of
> > the same opinion.
>
> > We need to speed up the process at the earliest...since they are handing
> > over the possession...
>
> > Reg'ds,
> > Sandeep Shetty
> > Mob: +97150-4563446
>
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Shaleen Chugh <shaleenga...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> Dear All,
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> Hope you noticed my previous mails.....I copied all the mails to Vatika as
> >> well as to Sanjeev with a request to take up the matter with Mr. Bhalla, who
> >> is the M. Dir or the person who looks after the company.
>
> >> I have already written that we must not take the possession unless the
> >> place is worth living and is complete in all respect. Lower prices or other
> >> issues relating to world wide financial turmoil is beyond the company's
> >> scope. But they must complete the place in all respect before handing over
> >> the possessions.
>
> >> Thanks and Retards
>
> >> --
> >> Shaleen Chugh
> >> Head of Corporate Banking
> >> Qatar National Bank-Oman
> >> P O Box 4050, PC112
> >> Sultanate of Oman
> >> Mobile :    00968 95328173
> >>                00968 99468967
> >> Direct line 00968 24725540
> >> Fax          00968 24779233
> >> shaleen.ch...@qnb.com.qa
>
> >>   On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 10:52 PM, ARUN BHANDARI <
> >> bhandari.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Hello Everyone,
> >>> May I suggest that instead of having emotional exchange of opinions, we
> >>> should list down the points where Vatika has not delivered as per the
> >>> promises made. Let these be just hard facts and nothing else.
> >>> This way we will be able to speak in one voice.
> >>> Facts such as
> >>> At the time of Delivery of our properties what was the understanding on-
> >>> 1)Access to Project - Was it the understanding / Promise that access will
> >>> be from Proper enterence instead of Thikaria Villege. What is mentioned in
> >>> the project brochure.
> >>> 2) Club House - Will it be ready?
> >>> The ones who have already taken possession, would be able to list down
> >>> points where what is delivered is not as per the promise made , agreed by
> >>> Vatika.
> >>> This will help us put together key points.
> >>> I am sure Mr.Sanjeev could be of great help in preperation of this list
> >>> in addition to every one who has taken the possession.
> >>> Thanking you,
> >>> ARUN BHANDARI.
>
> >>> On 4/19/09, Oscar D'Souza <oscar.dsou...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> Dear Sreemant,
>
> >>>> I appreciate your comments, I may sound negative but this is because of
> >>>> my first hand experience there. I guess you too should visit the site and
> >>>> then form your opinion. The views which I have formed were shared by other
> >>>> plot owners in Vatika Infotech City who are based in India, they have a
> >>>> better understanding of things. I will respond to Mr. Sanjeev's mail in
> >>>> detail as I was back from India only yesterday.
>
> >>>> The reason I have brought all these issues was to mobilise a common
> >>>> front to ensure that Vatika does not neglect the development at the project.
> >>>> If all of us have a lax attitude Vatika will take their own sweet time to
> >>>> develop the project citing economic reasons. I fully agree with Shaleen's
> >>>> view on the issue of possession but I still decided to take possession as I
> >>>> wanted to finish all the formalities when I was in India.
>
> >>>> I strongly support the feeback given by Gagan. I recommend that all of
> >>>> you should visit the site, visit other developments in Jaipur and discuss
> >>>> with neutral real estate agents in Jaipur to form a proper opinion.
>
> >>>> Regards,
>
> >>>> Oscar
>
> >>>>> 2009/4/15 Gagan Lalwani <gagan.lalw...@gmail.com>
>
> >>>>>  I agree with Sanjeev and Oscar both partially!  As far as Oscar is
> >>>>>> concerned he is right, the place is not liveable in current condition (my
> >>>>>> own visit observation), especially for entrance (he is absolutely correct in
> >>>>>> his description) and day to day facilities.  Therefore, it is bit of hurry
> >>>>>> on the part of Vatika to hand over.  If they had told us that the facilities
> >>>>>> (basic) will follow the handover I think our decision would be different.
>
> >>>>>> Sanjeev is true!  the investment is our decision.  If we can non sale
> >>>>>> it or rent it is our luck.  No one predicted the situation at that time.
> >>>>>> However, Vatika on their part is also not been fair when it comes to just
> >>>>>> getting rid of these apartments.  Nowhere in the world you move people 20 km
> >>>>>> away from the town without basic facilities like medical, grocerries, bank,
> >>>>>> schools etc.  Mind it these are part of the whole project so any
> >>>>>> construction should be along with these basic amenities.
>
> >>>>>> So guys!  it's a call we have to take if we can go and live.  If yes,
> >>>>>> take possession and be happy and if not then talk to developer, which none
> >>>>>> of us has done so far.
>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Sanjeev Kapur <sanj...@kapurs.net>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>  Dear Mr Bhandari,
> >>>>>>> I too have taken possession of a unit in Urban Woods on Delonix
> >>>>>>> street .
>
> >>>>>>> My comments to the points raised by oscar d'souza are given hereunder
> >>>>>>> ;
>
> >>>>>>> 1. Access to the development : The main gate of the township opens on
> >>>>>>> ajmer road at the point where the toll plaza is right now. The entry road
> >>>>>>> from Ajmer road is 130 feet wide. The state govt has asked the National
> >>>>>>> Highway authority for shifting of the the toll plaza and then Vatika would
> >>>>>>> be allowed open the Main access road. It should happen very shortly after
> >>>>>>> elections.
>
> >>>>>>> 2. Electric Fittings are never provided by any builder. Neither were
> >>>>>>> they promised. Same is the case with wardrobes.
>
> >>>>>>> 3. Thats Mr Oscar D'souza perception which is totally wrong. I am a
> >>>>>>> resident of Jaipur and deal with lawyers every other day for registeration
> >>>>>>> and for my own unit also i had verified the rates from the courts. The rates
> >>>>>>> charged by Vatika are actuals as paid by them and are reasonable.
>
> >>>>>>> 4. *Development at Site:* The speed of construction has slowed down
> >>>>>>> but not stopped as reported by this gentleman. 95% of UW , plot units and
> >>>>>>> commercial is sold as per this gentleman. This again is not a fact. They
> >>>>>>> have siphoned off money to develop other projects is another one of his
> >>>>>>> imaginations and as in the past he gets carried over and exagerates. Its his
> >>>>>>> frustration at not being able to sell his unit. He uses such venomous
> >>>>>>> language for Vatika only to vent out his frustartion.
>
> >>>>>>>  *5. Renting/Sale of Units :*Renting is on and i too have rented my
> >>>>>>> unit just yesterday. As regards Re-sale there has been a standstill since
> >>>>>>> last 5/6 months but again one has to be optimistic. I personally feel feel
> >>>>>>> that it should pick up within next 12 months from today. Again that my
> >>>>>>> personal feeling and i could be proved wrong by the market.
>
> >>>>>>> 6. Retail Outlet is small currently coz of a small demand from just
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Shaleen Chugh

unread,
Apr 21, 2009, 2:22:13 PM4/21/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear Amit,

I do not agree with you. We lose out to builders because we think we are alone and cannot take Builders head on. I bought my first house in DLF in Dec'1990 and they delayed the registration after taking the money for registration papers. I decided to take them head on and filed complaint first with the company and then wrote 6 letters till Mr. K P Singh and they paid me interest on the registration amount kept with them for 6 months.

Similarly I had to fight with Citi bank for their loan granted for a property in Chennai in 1996 and CitiBank gave up. The last property was bought at Westend heights and DLF completed club house and other amenities with in 90 days of possession. What I am trying to say is through all this is when we buy a house in any colonies it has to be livable units. We have paid separately for car park and club membership fees etc. This is imperative for them to complete the promised directly or through publicity material. Its like when we buy any article legally we do not sign any papers for the functional value but it is supposed to have the functional value.

We all sign all the documents and being working in various banks my experience is that we cannot ask for compensations or any thing relating to slow down or financial turmoil etc but we can all write to Vatika for completion of the project before handing over.

They have already delayed the project beyond their original commitment. I would suggest everyone to go through the news paper Hindustan Times 16th April 2009 Delhi edition. I get epaper and on the front page the news was " People gathered in front of DLF and Vatika builders office for refund for the flats booked in their projects at Gurgaon". News said DLF agreed to give option either to opt out or wait for 6 months ...........The message was that people are moving together and taking the builders head on.

I think very strongly that we need to think positively and ask for our right. Some how I don't believe in giving up so easily.

Cheers

Shaleen

--
Shaleen Chugh
Head of Corporate Banking
Qatar National Bank-Oman
P O Box 4050, PC112
Sultanate of Oman
Mobile :    00968 95328173
               00968 99468967
Direct line 00968 24725540
Fax          00968 24779233

Sanjay Khanna

unread,
Apr 21, 2009, 3:22:13 PM4/21/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Guys,
I am a new joinee to this group. I am yet to take posession.
I agree that we all expected better conditions before the hand-over. Moreover, the hand-over was expected quicker so that we could turn it around for our ROI. However, best we can do now is to ask for improvement in conditions there before hand-over or some kind of compensation for people who have taken the posession.
Before we take it too far though, has anybody discussed this with Vatika.
Are  Sanjeev and Mr. Bhalla part of this group and aware of these problems? Do they represent Vatika?

I am asking to be more aware.

Thanks
Sanjay

Anil Verma

unread,
Apr 22, 2009, 12:22:42 AM4/22/09
to vatika...@googlegroups.com

Dear All

 

I fully support shallen’s view . one has to fight to get his legal right . If you give up so easily then you don’t get what is your legal right . I will also share my experience with Vatika wherein they never fulfilled their promises to build and handover the apartment booked by me in their Vatika City project ( Emilia 5 ) at Gurgaon

 

I had a long fight with Mr. Anil and Gaurav Bhalla to refund my money  plus current  premium . Initially they threatened me and ask me to do what ever I can do . I took this as a challenge and approach the Chief Minister of Haryana and explained him the whole story . He immediately called from my mobile to Mr. Bhalla and ordered him to pay me the refund + Premium . Vatika settled my account within next two days and I earned a huge premium , which was my right .  

 

All I want to say instead of writing to each other let Shaleen take the lead in this matter  and we all should join together to write a strong letter with a copy to news paper . My uncle is there in Punjab Kesari and I can support in this matter to highlight this f in the news  paper .

 

Let me know your views …

 

 

Best Regards

 

Anil Verma

Director - Logistics & Supply Chain

Mobile +971502740490

Dir +971 4 423 4430

Fax +971 4 429 8448

P.O.Box 6767, Dubai, UAE

anil....@aswaaq.ae

www.aswaaq.ae

PJSC under formation

logo

 

 

This message is intended for the recipient named above.  It may contain confidential or privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Do not read, copy, use or circulate this communication.

 

 recycle-icone Think before you print. Please help your city save paper – only print this message if necessary. If you must print – recycle

 

From: vatika...@googlegroups.com [mailto:vatika...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Shaleen Chugh
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:22 PM
To: vatika...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Urban Woods & Vatika Infotech City, Jaipur

 

Dear Amit,

Tanmay Goyal

unread,
Jan 10, 2019, 1:19:58 AM1/10/19
to Vatika-Jaipur
Hello All, 

I am looking for a ground floor in Urban Woods (vatika infotech city, jaipur). If anyone of us would like to sell their property, please contact as below

Regards
Tanmay Goyal

Chandra Sen Hada

unread,
Jan 10, 2019, 1:24:19 AM1/10/19
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
How much you are will to pay? 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Vatika-Jaipur" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vatika-jaipu...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to vatika...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/vatika-jaipur.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Chandra Sen Hada

Ancel Fernandes

unread,
Jan 10, 2019, 1:46:22 AM1/10/19
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Hi Tanmay,

I have a ground floor unit at Urban Woods, which I want to sell.

You could contact me on +971504585183

Warm regards,

Ancel Fernandes

Mobile Phone / Whatsapp: +971504585183

                             ============
How to Get Unlimited $500/$1000 Instant Payments
CLICK HERE
How to Benefit as an Angel Investor
CLICK HERE
Learn About & Profit from Bitcoin & Cryptos
CLICK HERE

"Being in the right place at the right time isn't the key to success. 
Realizing that you're there and doing something about it is the key."
 
~ Robert Kiyosaki
***********************************************************************************


--

Arun Srivastava

unread,
Jan 10, 2019, 4:47:25 AM1/10/19
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear Admin,

Please delete my email address from your mailing list. I do not any unit in Vatika Urban Woods. 

Regards, 
Arun 

--

Aslam Khan

unread,
Jan 13, 2019, 12:41:19 AM1/13/19
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear Group Admin,

Please remove my email id from the group as I do not own any unit in the this project. 

I had initially booked one, but later withdrew. 

Thanks for your understanding and action. 

Mohammad Aslam Khan 

srinivas bylahalli

unread,
Jan 13, 2019, 2:15:02 AM1/13/19
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Hi Tanmay 
I have two first floor apartments adjacent to each other.
If you are interested we can take it forward.
Thanks
Srinivas
--

Tanmay Goyal

unread,
Jan 13, 2019, 2:22:08 AM1/13/19
to vatika...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sir,

Thank you for your offer. I am more interested in ground floor apartment.



Regards
Tanmay Goyal 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages