On Oct 11, 2010, at 2:27 AM, niscala dasi wrote:
>>> Vaishya vanaprastha (Theoretically possible but not seen in practice. Upon retirement a grhastha becomes a vanaprastha who either travels with or without his wife to holy places. In any case he separates from his children.)
>
> thats kind of contradictory prabhu- besides, so many devotee
> businessmen in ISKCON have retired and taken full-time to spiritual
> life- I know of several myself...you don't know of any?
Certainly that is why I said it is possible.
>>> Sudra brahmachari (Not a possible combination because he does not take upanayanam sacred thread samskara thus officially entering Vedic celibate studentship or brahmacharya and he does not go to gurukula. At or before puberty he must get married or he will cause problems in society.)
>
> I am sorry, I didn't make myself clear. Let me make myself clear now-
> with the odd exception, I always write about VA as it applies to
> devotees, SP recommending a VA college for training in all the varnas-
> if I am not mistaken- another point- I also write about VA as it
> applies to the modern age, when devotee children are by law required
> to be educated to age 16. It happens in Kerala, btw, in case you think
> me a bit Eurocentric! :)
I am speaking of VA not modern Kerala or even western law. In VA there are no Sudra Brahmacharis. You have suggested that there are by reinterpreting the word Brahmachari. Any male who is not married is not a Brahmachari. If low class (worker) males are not married by puberty it is a major cause of all sorts of sins. Since any VA system should be aimed as regulating and reducing sins this should not be allowed. If you allow for low calls (worker) males to study their crafts and apprentice without marrying then you have to put up with dating, rape, porn, prostitution, contraception and all sorts of illicit sex. The VA solution to illicit sex is marriage (surprise!!!). When men reach a stage where they cannot or will not remain celibate they should be married (same for women). For women and worker males that stage is puberty.
>>> Sudra vanaprastha (Theoretically possible but not seen in practice. Sudras do not retire, and they must always be dependent on the dvijas they serve thus an independent state like Vanaprastha is not possible for them.)
>
> Sudras must retire from physical work as they age- the body requires
> it- and this is an ideal time to associate with sadhus, and progress
> spiritually by learning the science of Krsna.
But at the same time they are being looked after by their masters. They are never independent, thus they cannot travel independently from their masters. Thus they cannot be vanaprasthas. Cows that are old and cannot produce milk are cared for in goshalas in India till they die, this is because like the worker the cow is dependent on the master for everything. Old cows are not set free to roam all over the place in India, Old Cow protection like Old worker protection is not independent. You should read more about traditional VA and also understand how the system actually works in India.
> After that, they may
> even become guru, according to Mahaprabhu! Amazing, isn't it?
In theory but not in practice. A guru is not dependent like a worker on his master. Although our sastras do allow for gurus of different classes, the Goswamis have explained that one should not accept a guru from a lower class if there is a guru of a higher class available.
The practice of VA and it's interface with the practice of Vaisnavism is interesting but in general only brahmins are gurus. There are exceptions no doubt. But again we must know the general rules before knowing the exceptions. This was my previous complaint about your ideas. That you want everyone and every situation to be an exception. In general what I have laid out in this post is the rule. I do not deny that their might be exceptions to some. If you want society to function the best you follow the general rules though not base everything on exceptions. For example the GBC decide who can be a guru in ISKCON. They have some rules for it. In those rules it says that a guru must know Prabhupada's books. Some gurus in history have been illiterate. Therefore such gurus if they appeared today in ISKCON would not be allowed to be gurus. Thus the rule is that a guru must be literate but an exception is that he may not be. Many sudras in Vedic times were illiterate. So they could be gurus, but in general they won't be because they can't even read the sastras.
> This must be examined because a marriage between a boy of the vipra-
> varna and a girl of the sudra-varna is incompatible; married life
> would be miserable for both husband and wife. Consequently a boy
> should marry a girl of the same category. Of course, this is trai-
> gunya, a material calculation according to the Vedas, but if the boy
> and girl are devotees there need be no such considerations. A devotee
> is transcendental, and therefore in a marriage between devotees, the
> boy and girl form a very happy combination. SB 6.2.26
>
> Interesting quote- I always like to ask "why?" (that makes me
> inquisitive and therefore, logically, a ksatriya- GKP?)
Not all inquisitive people are Ksatriyas. Since Prabhupada has stated it, and Manu also by the way as well as all the other Dharmasastras, you have to accept it.
Why is it so? Because people of different natures will be incompatible. Why is there so much divorce in the world. Because the people are not matched according to their natures.
That is the reason.
> Why would the
> married life be miserable?
Varnas are according to guna and karma. Brahmins are predominantly in the mode of goodness. Sudras are predominantly in the mode of ignorance. Therefore a boy in the mode of goodness married to a girl in the mode of passion or ignorance will have problems. The girl will be more lusty than the boy and degrade him. The same is true if the match were a brahmin girl and sudra boy but reversed. In that case the boy would degraded the girl. This is spoken of in the Gita. When women are degraded then the whole society is destroyed. Therefore we must know the grade or class of each man and woman and match them accordingly so that they are equally matched. This is still done in India and by some more sophisticated ISKCON devotee parents who follow it. Others combine like cats and dogs without any evaluation of Varna. That is not VA.
> I think that practically speaking, if one
> spouse is peaceful and completely detached from sex life, and the
> other one is- let us say- a little "hot" then what? It is a very
> common problem in ISKCON- one partner is peaceful and detached, the
> other is passionate and desirous, and the passionate one cannot have
> his/her desires fulfilled, and in frustration, he or she looks
> elsewhere...
See above. The answer is matching. You have previously voiced you opposition to astrology even though Prabhupada accepted it's use for choosing Varna of kids, now he is again suggesting it's use with adults for choosing their Varna and matching them for marriage. Do you accept Prabhupada or not? If you do then despite you opposition that there are no bonafide astrologers you should be looking to find that bonafide astrologer or at least looking into how astrologers make such determinations by the rules of sastra. Just denying that any astrologer can properly make a determination does not solve the problem. You must accept a system of Varna determination otherwise Prabhupada says above that you will have problems. This is why I say that Varna determination is the very first essential step in VA.
> but peaceful brahmanas
Do not confuse brahmanas with vaisnavas. Not all vaisnavas are brahmanas. Just wearing a string on one's shoulder does not make one a brahmin.
> will not only have no problem being
> celibate together,
Celibacy in the presence of the opposite sex is the most difficult situation. The sastra says the fire always melts the butter. Better to have a society of only celibate monks like the Buddhists.
Marriage is not meant for celibacy. It is meant for licit sex. Kamo'smi bharatarshabha. What is licit for one class may not be for another. Manu has no rules for sex for sudras except that they should not have sex with those of higher varnas. Apart from that he allows them to freely have sex. No sudra is sanctioned for having sex with another sudra. Naturally the good sudras only have sex with their own wives. Other classes have other rules. Read Manu. Prabhupada said that it is the lawbook for VA, for human society.
> but also have very interesting philosophical
> discussions..so the levels of detachment- and also realization- need
> to be matched- IF there is a really and truly qualified astrologer (do
> hens have teeth?) his advice can be taken on board...
There must be. Because Prabhupada has said that it should be done. If he says that it should be done then we must do it.
GKD