Nietzsche question

33 views
Skip to first unread message

Amber Partington

unread,
Jun 26, 2024, 10:01:25 PM6/26/24
to VAPS VCE Network (The Victorian Association for Philosophy in Schools)
Hey Philosophers,

A student brought up a question in relation to Section 228 of BGAE.

"... what is right for one cannot by any means therefore be right for another, that the demand for one morality for all is detrimental to precisely the higher men, in short that there exists an order of rank between man and man, consequently also between morality and morality."

My student would like to know if Nietzsche is actually endorsing slave morality for the slaves... ie. just so long as the moral system is right for the rank of the man

What do you all think?

Cheers,


James Watt

unread,
Jun 26, 2024, 10:50:24 PM6/26/24
to vaps-vce
Hey Amber & all,

I reckon it's kinda right, but further still that talking about it in categories or systems (e.g. "slave morality for the slaves") is a bit reductive. He's surely not about just finding the right system of rules to fit the right individual, right? 

He definitely does think that some people shouldn't be aspiring to great heights where they wouldn't be able to bear that kinda life, for a whole variety of reasons. But this doesn't imply that some people are naturally or inherently born as "slaves", like these are neat categories that people either are or aren't sorted into, where tension and growth and stagnation etc aren't to be found across a life:  " I add at once that in all higher and mixed cultures attempts at mediation between the two are apparent and more frequently confusion and mutual misunderstanding between them, indeed sometimes their harsh juxtaposition—even within the same man, within one soul. " (s260)

Slightly related, but one of my faves from the Gay Science:
image.png

The only universal moral rule is that everyone deserves a great holiday break,

--
VAPS: The Victorian Association for Philosophy in Schools
Supporting philosophical thinking in Victorian schools
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VAPS VCE Network (The Victorian Association for Philosophy in Schools)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vaps-vce+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vaps-vce/CAGAYaJtq3AndOrnk3%3DnUdcxAeJUp0-%2BeO4s4iPyPx%2BgMuPG4hw%40mail.gmail.com.

Amber Partington

unread,
Jun 27, 2024, 6:34:20 PM6/27/24
to James Watt, vaps-vce
Thanks James (and all)

I agree with everything you have said (particularly your universal moral rule)... my voice is the only one they hear, so I really appreciate getting some additional thoughts to share with them.

Happy end of term (for most of us I think)!




Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages