LPG
has been identified by the World Bank as the most environmentally
friendly of all fossil fuels. An average South African household that
switches to LPG for domestic cooking and heating could save over 120 kg
of firewood every year. In this country, LPG’s main competitor in the
lower income market is paraffin, a fuel that has one of the highest
carbon footprint of all fuels.
Paraffin is also undesirable from
a safety perspective – it is linked to thousands of deaths of mainly
women and children each year around the world.
One of the
challenges of increasing usage of LPG in the broader community,
especially in lower income areas, is the perception that it is pricey.
People believe LPG is more expensive than paraffin, but in terms of
energy consumption – comparing the calorific output of LPG with that of
paraffin – LPG is actually cheaper.
What is urgently required is
relooking the packaging of LPG – smaller 3 kg or 5 kg bottles, as used
in other emerging markets such as India, China and Brazil, will increase
the uptake of LPG in these areas.
The price of LPG still needs to
be brought down significantly, however. There is a huge disconnect
between the international price of LPG and the local price. The maximum
retail price in South Africa has been capped by the department of energy
since 2010, and we currently have the fourth-highest priced LPG in the
world.
At issue is the maximum refinery gate price (MRGP). The
price of LPG is linked to the price of gasoline, which is at odds with
what is happening internationally. We have been talking about the MRGP
for years without any action being taken.
Another issue affecting
pricing is the fact that value-added tax (VAT) is charged on LPG, but
not on paraffin. This is quite frankly mystifying. To level the playing
fields, the department of energy and all industry players need to lobby
National Treasury to remove VAT on all LPG products – for both domestic
and commercial use.
In my view, Treasury would do better to
introduce a very low surcharge which could be used for a cylinder fund
to bring 3 kg and 5 kg bottles to the market and subsidise them to make
them available to lower income individuals at no charge.
To further ensure pricing structures that are affordable to all South Africans, competition in the LPG industry needs to be actively promoted to prevent monopolies. Progress in terms of developing a workable regulatory framework and the enforcement of competitive pricing mechanisms has been very slow, however.
This also has a significant impact on the consistent availability of LPG in South Africa. The world is not short on LPG – in fact, there is an overproduction of around 20 million tonnes per year. However, South African refineries continue to under-produce, and our local industry requires imports to grow – last year, 16% of the 400 000 tons of LPG consumed in South Africa was imported.
A huge barrier to
increasing imports of LPG is the inadequacy of the existing LPG
production and supply chain. Import handling and storage facilities are
insufficient, and the existing transport infrastructure does not provide
economically viable solutions to importers nor to their large
industrial users.
Competition with regards to import terminals
is especially important. But we are still debating how many terminals
South Africa should have, which poses a real constraint for companies
looking to import gas.
A consistent, cost-effective supply of LPG
can only be guaranteed through an investment in South Africa’s LPG
import, handling and storage facilities, as well as in extended supply
chain infrastructure and peripheral industries.
This includes
rail and road transport systems, cylinder manufacturing and LPG filling
plants and well-established consumer distribution networks. It is
therefore imperative that we urgently address the current lack of a
suitable regulatory framework – one of the key barriers to the
development of an efficient and sustainable LPG infrastructure.