Sirah Nabawiyah Ibnu Ishaq Pdf
Stayla Casillas
This article aims to explain the results of the analysis through a comparison of historiographical works in the form of the Sirah Nabawiyah written by Ibn Ishaq and Ibn Hisham. The research method used is a historical research method with four steps, those are: 1) Heuristics or source collection, the data collection technique used is a literature study by looking for the sirah nabawiyah Ibn Ishaq and Ibn Hisham, as well as books and journal articles relevant to the research. this; 2) Source Criticism; 3) Interpretation or analysis of data, the analysis is carried out in analyzing the selection of sources in making the Sirah Nabawiyah of these two figures, as well as writing the narrative of the sirah whether subjective or objective; 4) Historiography. The results of the study show that the objectivity of historical facts contained in Ibn Ishaq's works is a little weak but his works are perfected by Ibn Hisham's works. In terms of scientific methodology, Ibn Ishaq is not as strong as Ibn Hisham, Ibn Ishaq's sirah nabawiyah, some stories have weak source strengths and are slightly less relevant in some of the contents of his work, through Ibn Hisham many studies of Ibn Ishaq's sirah nabawiyah have been corrected, omitted irrelevant contents and sources and then perfected through the science of hadith transmission. Sirah Nabawiyah Ibn Hisham is the most trusted sirah to date.
The position of sirah or the study of the history of the prophet Muhammad SAW has an important position in the Islamic religious tradition where it ranks second after the study of hadith or sunnah. Thus, this article aims to describe how the study of the nabawiyah sirah was carried out by the two main retainers of its writing, especially seeing how the process and the relationship between these two sirah works from a historical perspective. This article itself was written with a qualitative descriptive approach supported by data collection methods in the form of literature study. From the results of the review, it is known that Ibn Ishaq's sirah is the first work that is able to systematically review the life story of the prophet, although there are still many shortcomings and finally it was perfected by Ibn Hisham with his sirah work. Both Ibn Ishaq and Ibn Hisham, both have important contributions in writing the book Sirah Nabawiyah. Ibn Ishaq with the quality of his book narration is strong enough to make his work an important reference in the study of the nabawiyah sirah.
Pada generasi selanjutnya, hadir beberapa ulama yang menulis kitab dengan pembahasan sirah nabawiyah secara khusus. Di antara yang cukup populer dalam generasi penulis pertama adalah Muhammad bin Ishaq bin Yassar (w. 152 H).
Mayoritas ulama dan pakar hadits sepakat bahwa seluruh riwayat Muhammad bin Ishaq terpercaya, kecuali yang diperolehnya dari Malik dan Hisyam bin Urwah bin Zubair karena keduanya dinilai cedera (jarh) sebagai seorang rawi.
Karena memang kitab ini ringkasan kitab Ibnu Ishaq. Pembahasan terkait kehidupan Nabi Muhammad dalam kitab ini dimulai sejak Nabi lahir sampai kewafatannya. Kitab tersebut juga menyajikan pembahasan dengan detail dan jelas. Selain itu juga menghindari syair-syair Arab dan beberapa riwayat dari kitab Ibnu Ishaq yang dinilai tidak memiliki sanad kuat. Artinya, meski kitab ini ringkasan dari Ibnu Ishaq, tetapi bukan sebatas meringkas, melainkan sudah melalui penelitian ilmiah yang cukup matang.
c80f0f1006