Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

KKKarel is not a racist .....

1 view
Skip to first unread message

²“¡ŒiŽ.otr@andwinaprize.gpa.carrickism.mp.ga.fololedya Spot....the...Socialist... ²

unread,
Jan 2, 2004, 7:37:44 PM1/2/04
to

"Karen Gordon" <ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:bt52h8$srm$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
> Search Result 4
> From: Karl Pollak (kpo...@nospam.com)
> Subject: Re: Globe & Mail, Letters to the Editor
> Newsgroups: soc.culture.czecho-slovak
> Date: 1997/10/19
>
> Whoa, you're skating on a very thin ice there, cousin. Let us not
> forget that Canada has also accepted proven war criminals, drug
> dealers, child molesters, murderers and all sorts of other vermin as
> refugees. Just because somebody is accepted by the Canadian refuge
> determination process does not give the applicant a halo around his
> head.

How the hell did you get into Canada, where you sercertly cloned by some
National socilaist feminazi Party KKKaren, or where you that weird Liberal
experiment gone wrong..


Nelson

unread,
Jan 2, 2004, 7:40:12 PM1/2/04
to
Hehehehehehe, Feminazi I am sure

<Spot....the...Socialist...㬢 ﹒iZ.otr <Spot....the...Socialist...㬢
"﹒iZ.otr@and WIN a Prize.gpa.carrickism.mp.ga.fololedya>> wrote in message
news:s9oJb.135301$ss5.50083@clgrps13...

Jennifer Wainwright

unread,
Jan 2, 2004, 7:48:25 PM1/2/04
to

"Karen Gordon" <ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:bt52h8$srm$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
> Search Result 4
<snip>

I'm lost here, Diddums. What in all this desperate stuff demonstrated
"racsim", Hater?

Cheers,

Jennifer

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stop Racist Bigot Karen -- Before she lies again
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Nelson

unread,
Jan 3, 2004, 4:31:48 PM1/3/04
to
Jennifer just look up Feminazi on Google or somewhere's they are the racist!
About thing!

"Jennifer Wainwright" <JenniferW...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tjoJb.915944$pl3.640257@pd7tw3no...

²“S&*^*%$@iŽ%$&&*@bbacnews.bccacanada ¡O.otrBBACNEWS ²

unread,
Jan 3, 2004, 5:14:09 PM1/3/04
to

"Nelson" <kingst...@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
news:EDGJb.40883$mH2....@read1.cgocable.net...

> Jennifer just look up Feminazi on Google or somewhere's they are the
racist!
> About thing!

You might be a Feminazi if . .
- You think males have it "easier" than females
- You're a proponent of Selective Service

- You feel that husbands should "obey" their wives in opposite-sex marriages

- You assume that all men are pigs

- You think your sexual purpose on this Earth is to make men cum

- Your idea of a fair divorce settlement is an ex-husband waivering a
majority of his income to his ex-wife, despite which ex-spouse earns more

- You think women should rule the world

- You assert that women hold "superior" intuition and judgement compared to
men

- Kicking males in the nuts (or seeing males get kicked in the nuts) gives
you recreational thrills

- You think all males should be locked up or shipped off to an island during
puberty, adolescence, and/or early post-adulthood

- Sperm production is the prime purpose for which you feel males serve

- You assume that gay men are "pathetic weaklings who don't have the balls
to interact with women"

- The ideal scenario to you in any opposite-sex marriage is when the female
spouse is "the head of the house"

- You have no sympathy for males' medical burdens (i.e., erectile
disfunctions, colon cancer, prostate cancer, severe acne, vasectomies,
penile infections/complications, teen/adult circumcisions)

- You argue with men just for the sake of arguing with men

- You want the 19th Amendment to be amended to stipulate that all male
voters must take "intelligence tests" before being eligible to vote

- You think Homer Simpson is an accurate representation of the average
American male

- You view men as dogs who need to be "trained" to heed every command of
members of the female gender

Go here to read You might be a Masculinazi if . . .
You might be a Masculinazi if . .

- You think females have it "easier" than males

- You presume that no woman is strong enough to serve in military combat

- You feel that wives should "obey" their husbands in opposite-sex marriages

- You view all women as sex objects

- You think every woman's sexual purpose on this Earth is to make you cum

- Your idea of a fair divorce settlement is an ex-wife waivering a majority
of his income to her ex-husband, despite which ex-spouse earns more

- You think men should rule the world

- You assert that men hold "superior" intuition and judgement compared to
women

- Snapping a female's bra is your idea of a good time

- You think all females should be auctioned off in the nude as retail
"property" of males

- Child-bearing is the prime purpose for which you feel females serve

- You assume that lesbians men are "man-hating bulldogs who are too ugly or
butch to attract men"

- The ideal scenario to you in any opposite-sex marriage is when the male
spouse is "the head of the house"

- You have no sympathy for females' medical burdens (i.e., menstruation,
fibroid tumors, pregnancy, menopause, vaginal infections, breast cancer,
hysterrectomies)

- You argue with women just for the sake of arguing with women

- You want the 19th Amendment to be repealed

- You think a Barbie doll is an accurate representation of the average
American female

- You view women as love slaves who must wait hand and foot on every command
of members of the male gender

Go here to read You might be a Feminazi if . . .

²“S&*^*%$@iŽ%$&&*@bbacnews.bccacanada ¡O.otrBBACNEWS ²

unread,
Jan 3, 2004, 9:10:30 PM1/3/04
to

"Karen Gordon" <ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:bt7mjd$5d5$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca...
> > ar...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Karen Gordon) wrote:
> >>(K): KKKarel - you've covered all the bases, I think.... sexist, bigot.
> >>racist and paranoid. I think you lost the 'moral authority' to attack
> >>anyone for anything at anytime - long ago.
>
> KKKarel Pollak (gu...@nospam.org) writes:
> > Still stalking, sweetie?
> > Did you have a problem with any of the above quotes?
>
> (K): Ah, so THAT'S what you consider 'stalking'. But it only applies
> when someone researches YOUR past posts, not when you research theirs.
> About right? You'd never have to identify yourself as a rightwinger
> and a BC Liberal, Pollak. Your hypocrisy does that for you.

Well Karl she is right about your being a back-bencher for the BC Liberals,
many people know you Karl, but being that KKKaren is a racist cunt, I don't
think anyone in NG has any respect for her anyhow..Tell the bitch to piss
off.


>
> --
> """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
> The problem with political jokes is they get elected
> """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


Bill Van

unread,
Jan 3, 2004, 9:13:55 PM1/3/04
to
In article <qCKJb.73421$6b2.18904@edtnps84>,
"¡O.otrBBACNEWS ²"S&*^*%$@iZ%$&&*"
<¡Œ.otrBBACNEWS ²“S&*^*%$@iŽ%$&&*@BBACNEWS.BCCACANADA,GVA.Sow> wrote:

> Well Karl she is right about your being a back-bencher for the BC Liberals,
> many people know you Karl, but being that KKKaren is a racist cunt, I don't
> think anyone in NG has any respect for her anyhow..Tell the bitch to piss
> off.
>

She's not the only one nobody in the NG respects, Artie.

And you still don't know what back-bencher means, do you? Someday, you
should look it up.

bill

²“S&*^*%$@iŽ%$&&*@bbacnews.bccacanada ¡O.otrBBACNEWS ²

unread,
Jan 3, 2004, 9:25:35 PM1/3/04
to

"Bill Van" <bill...@dotheobvious.yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:billvan22-14319...@news.telus.net...
> In article <qCKJb.73421$6b2.18904@edtnps84>,
> "﹒.otrBBACNEWS㬢"S&*^*%$@iZ%$&&*"

> <﹒.otrBBACNEWS㬢"S&*^*%$@iZ%$&&*@BBACNEWS.BCCACANADA,GVA.Sow> wrote:
>
> > Well Karl she is right about your being a back-bencher for the BC
Liberals,
> > many people know you Karl, but being that KKKaren is a racist cunt, I
don't
> > think anyone in NG has any respect for her anyhow..Tell the bitch to
piss
> > off.
> >
>
> She's not the only one nobody in the NG respects, Artie.

Now why would I give a shit about a socialist like you Billy or what you
piss ant moron's think. And Billy at least get my name right for once in
your peptic pathetic life...... It is Mark you goofy shit and you have
visited my website to know that also, you really do have shit for brains
idiot.

>
> And you still don't know what back-bencher means, do you? Someday, you
> should look it up.

LOL's, you BC Liberal crook...just like the rest of your goons.

>
> billy


²“S&*^*%$zzzzzzzzohhh@iŽ%$&&*@iŽ%$&&*@bbacnews.bccacanada BBAC¡O.otrBBACNEWS ²

unread,
Jan 5, 2004, 12:46:16 PM1/5/04
to

"Karl Pollak" <gu...@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:3ff77db3....@news.pacificcoast.net...
> x-no-archive: yes

> "﹒.otrBBACNEWS㬢"S&*^*%$@iZ%$&&*"
> <﹒.otrBBACNEWS㬢"S&*^*%$@iZ%$&&*@BBACNEWS.BCCACANADA,GVA.Sow> wrote:
>
>
> >Well Karl she is right about your being a back-bencher for the BC
Liberals,
>
> What are you talking about? Do you have a clue what a "back bencher" is?

LOL's, why yes Karl, but interesting how your back go up.

> Somebody who sits in the Legislature or House of Commons on the back
> benches. I have never even ran for office, much less being elected. But
I
> have never made any secrets about my long term membership in both
> provincial and federal parties.

Everyone knows that Karl, and where you stand on issues.

I had also never made any secrets abotu
> having served the party as riding prez several terms both prov and fed. as
> well as having done one term on the provincial executive.

So do you still get your soiecal perks for being a plum supporter... ;-)

>
> In fact, I am qwuite proud of my Liberal history.

You mean even this Karl, shame on you.
http://www.fathers.ca/the_status_of_women.htm

http://www.fathers.ca/civil_suit_on_sow.htm

I believe it going to cost your Liberal a lot of money to pay people off for
their stupidity. Very Nice Karl...more of the tax payers money down the
drain.

>
> >many people know you Karl, but being that KKKaren is a racist cunt, I
don't
> >think anyone in NG has any respect for her anyhow..Tell the bitch to piss
> >off.
>

> Why? She has the right to make as much ass of herself as anybody else.
Now why would I want her to shut the fuck up?

Good point, KKKaren makes it easy to identify her goals at the Sannich
police...and so that way they can be monitored for their actions in
committing crimes.

>
>
> --
> Greetings from Lotusland


²“S&*^*%$zzzzzzzzohhh@iŽ%$&&*@iŽ%$&&*@bbacnews.bccacanada BBAC¡O.otrBBACNEWS ²

unread,
Jan 6, 2004, 12:28:17 PM1/6/04
to

"Karl Pollak" <gu...@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:3ffa1eae....@news.pacificcoast.net...
> x-no-archive: yes

> "BBAC﹒.otrBBACNEWS㬢"ACNEWS.BCCACANADA,GVA.Sow> wrote:
>
>
> >Everyone knows that Karl, and where you stand on issues.
>
> If you know where I stand how can you ask an idiotici question like the
> following line?

Did you not notice the wink ;-) Karl, I guess not, well that explain why
Liberals seem to make a mess out of things.

>
> >So do you still get your soiecal perks for being a plum supporter... ;-)
>

> I have never sought nor received any special perks or any other rewards.
> Everybody who knows me knows where I stand on that point as well.

Sure Karl and I'm the green gaint and your the little green sprout.

>
> Aren't you the same guy who's been handing out those "Backroom Boys Out"
> buttons back in 1991? I still have mine.

You still got yours, wow, that must bring back exciting times for you. But
you never said a word about this Karl,

.> ( KARL SAID ) In fact, I am qwuite proud of my Liberal history.

Why is that Karl?

You mean this Karl, shame on you.
http://www.fathers.ca/the_status_of_women.htm

http://www.fathers.ca/civil_suit_on_sow.htm

I believe it going to cost your Liberal a lot of money to pay people off for

their Liberal stupidity.

Very Nice Karl...more of the tax payers money down the
drain.

> --
> Greetings from Lotusland


0 new messages